I've been waiting for a lot longer and still no reply :( some good things in
2.4 but its really starting more to look like I need to go back to 2.3 or find
something else too.
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:49:45 -0700
From: jonassimp...@yahoo.com
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
yeah the diff between the paying customers and the free ones, is we do the
testing :) upgraded and find all the bugs so the paying customers look and see
them and say nope I'll stay with the old version so my sites/server still
works . :D
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 21:35:33 +0200
From:
whereas advanced mode will be a
re-structured version of the current interface.
Kind regards,
Christian
oneforall immortal wrote:
HI
I wish there was a nice bug page for users setup. Becaus the eamil is
so hard to use and see responses etc.
But anyway I asked a while ago and witht his
.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:38:47 -0500
From: domin...@slackadelic.com
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] firewall rules are hard to use
On 1/4/2010 3:33 PM, oneforall immortal wrote:
well I'll have to go back to 2.2 I guess , I was going to paste my
domainanmme/blah
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] firewall rules are hard to use
On 1/4/2010 3:33 PM, oneforall immortal wrote:
well I'll have to go back to 2.2 I guess , I was going to paste my
domainanmme/blah/snapshot.jpg to some one and I could even check if it
works first .
all I want
: domin...@slackadelic.com
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] firewall rules are hard to use
On 1/4/2010 3:33 PM, oneforall immortal wrote:
well I'll have to go back to 2.2 I guess , I was going to paste my
domainanmme/blah/snapshot.jpg to some one and I could even
Plus I can't even figure out where to add the urls I don't want in the proxy to
bypass it. Thats was so easy to do. It makes no sence to me that it has to be
this darn hard to do this .
I hate that I can't in the browser on the machine I have the apache running
type in the domain name . It
no matter how much I try to understand this it has become more complicated than
it was and should be. New features are fine but to make it so darn hard to
figure out is not good at all.
It looks like I'll have to go back to 2.2 so everything works again .
The help doesn't even work anymore
Incoming routed traffic: you won't need
it!
Give yourself a overview looking at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation
cu
Von: oneforall immortal
[mailto:oneforal...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Dezember
2009 12:28
An: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re
is done, in reallity i like it more as
there aren't portforwarding rules in every FW.
On Thursday 31 December 2009 10:23:39 oneforall immortal wrote:
Destination NAT, Source NAT, Incoming routed traffic
these to are split up and make no sence to me now.
From
HI
I wish there was a nice bug page for users setup. Becaus the eamil is so hard
to use and see responses etc.
But anyway I asked a while ago and witht his email system it so darn hard too
find out if therer was any answers. I find and have seen others too having
trouble getting things that
ok this worked for me in efw2.2 and my main box with slackware running as
host/gateway/router. It also worked on my gateway router. lan nic 192.168.1.1
box A efw 2.3
box B 192.168.1.2 web server on port 81
now from box B I open ff or what ever browser put in the www.mydomain.com , and
it
Hi
I have the same problem too with this weird split tabs .
I'm just about to give up and use 2.2 again since it made more sense
I'm trying to get incoming port 587 to redirect to my mail box on the
lan(green) but I see in the /var/log/messages it is getting INPUT:DROP
But I have ANY
13 matches
Mail list logo
