Gerhard Stengel wrote:
Hi Damien
I owe you a follow-up on this one:
2009/1/26 Damien Sandras dsand...@seconix.com:
If ptlib has been compiled with libv4l support (libv4l being the
library, not the ptlib plugin), it should not be required anymore.
It isn't. I built a 3.0.2 from sources and
Hi Damien
I owe you a follow-up on this one:
2009/1/26 Damien Sandras dsand...@seconix.com:
If ptlib has been compiled with libv4l support (libv4l being the
library, not the ptlib plugin), it should not be required anymore.
It isn't. I built a 3.0.2 from sources and it works as
Hi Damien
I owe you a follow-up on this one:
2009/1/26 Damien Sandras dsand...@seconix.com:
If ptlib has been compiled with libv4l support (libv4l being the
library, not the ptlib plugin), it should not be required anymore.
It isn't. I built a 3.0.2 from sources and it works as expected -
Hi,
Le dimanche 25 janvier 2009 à 15:10 +0100, Bent a écrit :
Hi List
With kernel 2.6.27 the spca driver for a lot of webcams, including the
one I have got, was moved into the kernel. At the same time quite a
few video formats were taken out of the driver and moved to a
user-land library -
Hi List
With kernel 2.6.27 the spca driver for a lot of webcams, including the
one I have got, was moved into the kernel. At the same time quite a
few video formats were taken out of the driver and moved to a
user-land library - v4l1compat.so.
This means that in order for me to get video on
