Hi Jun,
thanks for the reply will look into this
GX
On Saturday, December 6, 2014 3:53:10 PM UTC+2, Jun Ohtani wrote:
>
> Hi GX,
>
> “term" query does NOT analyzed your string.
> See:
> http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/query-ds
t;query_string" : {
"default_field" : "ac",
"query" : "3A822F3B-3ECF-4463-98F86DF6DE28EC5C"
}
}
the problem is when I combine it with a "must_not" or "not" filter I still
get the same results
what
Monitor
> email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com
> web: www.campaignmonitor.com
>
>
> On 4 February 2014 17:20, GX > wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark
>>
>> Thanks for the seedy reply, I was not thinking of an immediate upgrade
>> since it needs to be scheduled tested et
1.0
0.20 -> 1.0
nuke and pave strait to 1.0
GX
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:42:11 AM UTC+2, Mark Walkom wrote:
>
> You will probably want to upgrade to 0.90.0 first.
> v1.0 is still RC so if this is production you might want to hold off.
>
> Regards,
> Mark Walkom
>
>
Hi All
it seems I have been slacking on keeping up do date with updates, will it
be possible to upgrade a 0.22.1 cluster to 1.0 or is it better to do it in
two steps i.e. 0.90.x first
Thanks
GX
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elastics
