Re: Query on Id field of nested documents fails.

field, the query works, so it has nothing to do with your mapping. I would > report it as a bug or use another field name. > > -- > Ivan > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:29 AM, dazraf > wrote: > >> Is this related to this issue? >> https://github.com/elasticse

Re: Query on Id field of nested documents fails.

Is this related to this issue? https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/3022 On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:43:01 UTC+1, dazraf wrote: > > Hi, > > Very grateful for any help with the following (rather urgent) issue. > Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/55ebb900b3c1758

Re: Query on Id field of nested documents fails.

Hi, Could anyone help please? We're kind of stuck right now - trying to get to a point that we demonstrate ES working for our use-cases to get management blessing. thanks Fuzz. On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 14:43:01 UTC+1, dazraf wrote: > > Hi, > > Very grateful for any help w

Query on Id field of nested documents fails.

Hi, Very grateful for any help with the following (rather urgent) issue. Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/55ebb900b3c17583bf58 The script clears the indices and sets up dynamic mapping so that all child documents are treated as nested. Then there are two queries on fields of

Re: Aggregations on nested array types

stinct mappings. However, what's we need is one mapping that can do both queries (ideally one that works with Kibana). thanks Fuzz. On Thursday, 3 April 2014 16:53:02 UTC+1, dazraf wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > thanks again for helping with this. > > I'm wondering why,

Re: Aggregations on nested array types

7;s required is one mapping a flexible way to do both (ideally with full Kibana support). thanks Fuzz. On Thursday, 3 April 2014 16:53:02 UTC+1, dazraf wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > thanks again for helping with this. > > I'm wondering why, in the solution, the mapping doesn

Re: Aggregations on nested array types

Hi Mark, thanks again for helping with this. I'm wondering why, in the solution, the mapping doesn't include the data node in the tree. In fact when I explicitly state the data node as a property of contestant, the aggregations come back blank.Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazr

Re: Aggregations on nested array types

l 2, 2014 5:13:22 PM UTC+1, dazraf wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I've also experimented with nested types using dynamic templates. >> Interesting (empty!) aggregation results! >> Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/9937198 >> >> Would be grateful if anyone c

Re: Aggregations on nested array types

Hi, I've also experimented with nested types using dynamic templates. Interesting (empty!) aggregation results! Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/9937198 Would be grateful if anyone can shed some light on this please? Thank you. On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 16:05:00 UTC+1, dazraf

Aggregations on nested array types

Hi, Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/9935814 Basically, I'd like to be able to aggregate a field of an array of observations, grouped by an ancestor/parent id. So for example (see gist): Aggregate the timings per contestant across a set of contests. I realise that the data c