Oh, I see what you mean...sorry about that. Thanks!
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 10:17:38 AM UTC-6, Darin Hensley wrote:
>
> Which cluster would give better read performance on two separate servers?
>
> ES cluster Foo
> [] serverA - 1 primary shard
> [] serverB - 2 replica Shards
>
> ES clus
On
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/replica-shards.html
in "Figure 52. Adjust the number of replicas to balance the load between
nodes" they show Node 3 which contains only 2 replica shards. They state in
it "The fact that node 3 holds two replicas and no prima
You won't ever be able to store two of the same replicas shards on the same
server, so your first example won't work.
On 22 January 2015 at 05:17, Darin Hensley wrote:
> Which cluster would give better read performance on two separate servers?
>
> ES cluster Foo
> [] serverA - 1 primary shard
>
Which cluster would give better read performance on two separate servers?
ES cluster Foo
[] serverA - 1 primary shard
[] serverB - 2 replica Shards
ES cluster Bar
[] serverA - 1 primary shard and 1 replica shard
[] serverB - 1 primary shard and 1 replica shard
--
You received this message beca
