Thanks. Makes sense
On Jul 3, 2014 2:18 PM, "joergpra...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Yes, the difference is not noticeable. Bulk requests have an extra logic
> for shard splitting, with a single index request, there is no overhead at
> all.
>
> Jörg
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Nikita Tovstoles
Yes, the difference is not noticeable. Bulk requests have an extra logic
for shard splitting, with a single index request, there is no overhead at
all.
Jörg
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Nikita Tovstoles <
nikita.tovsto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not. But I also do not if my tests recreate
I do not. But I also do not if my tests recreate conditions where
differences may surface.
Nikita
On Jul 3, 2014 1:35 PM, "joergpra...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> A question back: do you observe a significant difference?
>
> Jörg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Nikita Tovstoles <
> nikita.tovst
A question back: do you observe a significant difference?
Jörg
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Nikita Tovstoles <
nikita.tovsto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using ES Java API to talk to an ES server. Sometimes I need to index
> a single doc, sometimes dozens or hundreds at a time. I'd
Hi,
I am using ES Java API to talk to an ES server. Sometimes I need to index a
single doc, sometimes dozens or hundreds at a time. I'd prefer to keep my
code simple (am a contrarian thinker) and wonder if I can get away with
always using bulk API (ie BulkRequestBuilder). so that my interface t
