Re: trying to figure out the default analyzer for _all

2014-03-13 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
com) a écrit: > > Hi folks, I've been trying to figure out the default analyzer for > '_all'. At first, I was simply thinking that it would be the standard > analyzer. But as my testing shows, it's not the case at all (stop > words are kept?!)? After some testing, it

Re: trying to figure out the default analyzer for _all

2014-03-13 Thread David Pilato
olks, I've been trying to figure out the default analyzer for '_all'. At first, I was simply thinking that it would be the standard analyzer. But as my testing shows, it's not the case at all (stop words are kept?!)? After some testing, it would appear to be using th

trying to figure out the default analyzer for _all

2014-03-13 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
Hi folks, I've been trying to figure out the default analyzer for '_all'. At first, I was simply thinking that it would be the standard analyzer. But as my testing shows, it's not the case at all (stop words are kept?!)? After some testing, it would appear to be using the stan