Thanks for the clarification Mark
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:04:43 AM UTC+2, Mark Walkom wrote:
>
> The *easiest* is to do an upgrade directly to v1.0, but I highly doubt if
> that will even work after the upgrade due to the number of changes between
> 0.2X, 0.90.X and 1.0.0.
> And frankly,
The *easiest* is to do an upgrade directly to v1.0, but I highly doubt if
that will even work after the upgrade due to the number of changes between
0.2X, 0.90.X and 1.0.0.
And frankly, you'd be insane to consider it if you wanted to keep your data.
If you can export your data to disk, then reimpo
Hi Mark
Thanks for the seedy reply, I was not thinking of an immediate upgrade
since it needs to be scheduled tested etc, but rather considering skipping
90 since 1.0 is so close to release and doing a one step upgrade instead of
a 2 step so rather than do an upgrade now then again in a few mon
You will probably want to upgrade to 0.90.0 first.
v1.0 is still RC so if this is production you might want to hold off.
Regards,
Mark Walkom
Infrastructure Engineer
Campaign Monitor
email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com
web: www.campaignmonitor.com
On 4 February 2014 16:21, GX wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
Hi All
it seems I have been slacking on keeping up do date with updates, will it
be possible to upgrade a 0.22.1 cluster to 1.0 or is it better to do it in
two steps i.e. 0.90.x first
Thanks
GX
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" grou
