I calculated the antenna using AutoEZ invoking EZNEC v6.0.9. Transmission line
calculations using TLDetails (previously referenced) and/or if you have Excel,
LineLoss.xls. All except for EZNEC available from AC6LA.com. Dan has a wealth
of information on his site, all of it fabulous
Oh, whatever power is generated by the transmitter is going to radiate.
The classic example of "radiating power" that is completely and totally
uninteresting is when you dump the power into a resistor (a dummy load)
and the power is radiated as heat.
There is a contest where the participants
Mine has been OFF for a one week vacation once in three or four years since I
built it. I have a nite light that consumes more power.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:45 PM, Dave AD6A wrote:
>
> I recently added a KPA500 kit for my home station. It
Just turn the DSP Filter knob to whatever width you like.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 9:07 PM,
> wrote:
>
> I just got my new (used) K3/10 in the mail yesterday and have been having a
> blast with it. It came
I agree Dave. It's probably done for the same reason your TV and almost all
other electronics in your household (including things like TVs, modern
dishwashers, washing machines, etc.) in addition to your computer(s) are not
truly "off" unless you unplug them.
It's the current "fashion" in
I recently added a KPA500 kit for my home station. It went together just
fine, and overall I love it.
There is one thing about the way it works that bugs the engineer and
environmentalist in me.
Before I bought the PA, I thought I'd be able to turn it on/off entirely
using the ON button on
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Thomas Horsten wrote:
> The ATU typically sits at the rig end where a balun sits at the antenna
> feedpoint
There's the difference. I'm feeding my dipole with 600 ohm ladder line so
my 4:1 BALUN is right outside my window. The coax (heavily
One other item of interest - I do not have an ATU in the KX3 .. I have an
ATU at the out at input to the antenna
From: James Rodenkirch
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:16 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: KX3-KXPA100 operation
I just
Andy,
For normal operating, you will not find the 1kHz filter any more
beneficial than using the 2.7 (or 2.8) roofing filter.
The ultimate selectivity is provided by the DSP bandwidth, and not the
roofing filter.
The reason for the more narrow roofing filter is to provide isolation
from
I just connected my kx3 and a newly purchased kxpa100 (no KXAT100 ATU)...have
control of pwr from milliwatts to 100 and asll seems to be working correctly
exceptwhen in cw, the earphones on and the power set at 9 watts, I opted to
increase power past 10 - when I did some noticeable amount
Kev and all,
A voltage "balun" can be tapped to produce a wide range of impedance
transformation possibilities, but the voltage balun will have no effect
on the problem of RF on the outside of the coax shield.
The modern consensus is that only common mode chokes should be used on
the
I just got my new (used) K3/10 in the mail yesterday and have been having a
blast with it. It came with the 2.8 SSB filter and the 400 hz CW filter and I
have been told by a couple friends on the air who also have K3s that that’s all
I need.
But...nature abhors a vacuum. On my filter board. I
While it is "satisfying" to think of the ATU matching capability in
terms of SWR, that is not entirely valid.
A lot depends on frequency - at higher frequencies the "SWR matching
range" will be greater than on lower frequencies.
The only valid spec for the matching range is the available
Many manual ATU's consist of a variable capacitor and a tapped inductor.
It's a matching network but also works as an "on-the-fly" switchable balun.
The difference is the location. The ATU typically sits at the rig end where
a balun sits at the antenna feedpoint (and so may present the coax with a
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT <
k...@coldrockshotbrooms.com> wrote:
>
> That doesn't say the antenna would radiate it, but the transmitter could
> make power and the tuner/transmission line would deliver it to the radiat
Why wouldn't the antenna radiate it? Seems to
That's the problem with oversimplifying an explanation.
I read the original as "is it best practice to always use a 9:1 balun"
and the answer of course is, "if you don't need a 9:1 impedance
transformation, then you don't need a 9:1 balun."
73 -- Lynn
On 1/31/2017 5:17 PM, K9MA wrote:
On
On 1/31/2017 19:03, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT wrote:
If I did the math right (always a question) your load must be between
about 5 ohms and 500 ohms, so if your antenna is about 400 ohms (not
resistance, but impedance) then you're okay.
Not necessarily. That 400 Ohms could be almost pure
According to the KX3 documentation, the KXAT3 will handle a 10:1 VSWR
and "match" it.
If I did the math right (always a question) your load must be between
about 5 ohms and 500 ohms, so if your antenna is about 400 ohms (not
resistance, but impedance) then you're okay.
If you have a 600 ohm
There's quite a lot of interesting theory in the thread, but I think for
practical purposes my original answer still covers it, under the premise
we're talking QRP with a short feedline of RG58 (a few yards).
Small autotransformer baluns like the LDG 4:1 I use (I haven't tried the
Elecraft one
We have all learned to say, "Yes Dear." and carry on.
73,
Kevin. KD5ONS
On 1/31/2017 3:11 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
This list is a lot like being male and married ... no matter what you
do or say, you're going to be told you're wrong. [:-)
Most common baluns are *not
This list is a lot like being male and married ... no matter what you do
or say, you're going to be told you're wrong. [:-)
Most common baluns are *not transformers* as the energy does not pass
solely from input to output by magnetic coupling. In fact, I would
hazard a guess that *none* of
The 2017 Top Band Dinner at the Visalia International DX Convention will be
held on Friday, April 21, 2017 at the Marriott Hotel immediately adjacent to
the Visalia Convention Center.
Registration, program, menu and cost information can be found on the dinner’s
website:
Something doesn't seem right with that Care to post the math? Not
saying you're wrong, and I'd check it myself, but I'm otherwise occupied
this evening.
__
Clay Autery, KY5G
MONTAC Enterprises
(318) 518-1389
On 1/31/2017 4:12 PM, Wes Stewart wrote:
> A 130' dipole, 60'
A 130' dipole, 60' high on 160 has a feed point Z of ~4.5 -j1200. One hundred
feet of Wireman 553 (typical ladderline) will transform this to ~7.5 +j16 at the
input. The total loss in this "low-loss" line is over 12 dB.
On 1/31/2017 9:53 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
The intrinsic higher
What I have failed to see in this thread is that the *wire* in a proper
"balun" (more properly a common mode choke) is a transmission line,
That transmission line can be two conductors side by side, or it can be
two twisted wires, or it can be coax or any other type of transmission line.
Its
Morgan,
I looked for the 52:1 transformer at Balundesigns.com. No such animal found
unless I am not looking in the right place.
73,
Bill
K9YEQ
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Morgan
Bailey
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:31
Excellent explanation, Joe.
Thanks,
matt W6NIA
On 1/31/2017 12:12 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 1/31/2017 2:16 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
> A bal-un is a transformer. Technically, it has two windings on a
> ferromagnetic core material which for RF is typically some flavor of
> ferrite,
On 1/31/2017 11:52, Barry wrote:
It has little loss even at high SWR, far, far less than coax in the
extreme.
This is the real reason ladder line can be used at high SWR, not because
it necessarily reduces the SWR. (It was someone else, not Barry, who implied
otherwise.)
73,
Scott K9MA
On 1/31/2017 2:16 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
> A bal-un is a transformer. Technically, it has two windings on a
> ferromagnetic core material which for RF is typically some flavor of
> ferrite, usually in the form of a toroid.
Most common baluns are *not transformers* as the energy does not pass
Dear OM, I'd like to know if any friend has a board KIO3, to K3, for sale
and that is running 100%. Please, you can contact me at py...@arrl.org.
Thanks
--
Dick Rodrigues PY2RO
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
On 1/31/2017 1:50 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
Last I looked, there was no description of the Elecraft "balun" telling
us what it is. Perhaps Eric or Wayne could add that to the catalog
listing for it.
The manual for the Elecraft BL2 shows exactly what it is:
I disagree. A center fed quarter wave will have a complex impedance of a few
ohms of resistance and a very large capacitive reactance. SWR can be 100:1. I
know, I am doing it. Why it works with good open wire line is that the line can
transform the impedance to something that is easy to match
From the un-un/bal-un traffic, it seems there is some confusion and a
couple of "alternative facts" regarding this subject. Fortunately, it
is much more straightforward that it might seem.
A bal-un is a transformer. Technically, it has two windings on a
ferromagnetic core material which for
All of this discussion becomes badly confusing by failing to describe
these circuit elements by their real name. The word "balun" is a bastard
-- it is widely used to describe nearly a dozen things that are VERY
different from each other.
W4TV got it right by adding the correct description,
My points when I started this were open wire can help in a bad
situation. I was not using 130' antenna, but one that was only 33'. And
I was able to get out. Which leads to my second point. Some of us live
in areas or on property that is not best suited for HF antennas, but so
what. With a
The intrinsic higher impedance of ladder line helps reduce the losses
through a lower SWR than typical coax. A center fed wire at least 1/4 wave
long end-to-end on the lowest frequency used (e.g. 130 feet on 160 meters)
and fed with typical 350 to 450 ohm ladder line will show an SWR of 10:1 or
I have limited experience with a wire fed via a 9:1 "un-un", but that
experience was VERY good.
I borrowed a KX3 from a friend when I went to visit family in FL a few
years ago. I had a 9:1 "un-un", about 126' of wire, and 50 feet of RG8-X. I
got the feedpoint, up 30 feet into a tree, and the far
Be careful in the 9 to 1 vs 4 to 1 vs 1 to 1. The 9:1 is generally an UNUN.
When you run 100 watts or less most 1kw manufactured baluns or Ununs will
take a wide variety of SWR if you are only running 100 watts. Because this
thread is I believe about QRP the amount of power dissipated due to loss
On 1/31/2017 3:43 AM, Thomas Horsten wrote:
Depends on your random wire and what band(s) you want to use. For
some bands the 9:1 "balun" (not used as a true balun in this case,
since both the coax and the random wire are unbalanced by nature)
will step the feedpoint impedance down to something
I use an "L" match to tame mine. Touch up with KAT500. The KAT3 has similar
capability.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 11:34 PM, Marvin Wheeler wrote:
>
> Will the KAT 3 tune an end fed wire of about 180 ft on 160 meters?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
Sadly, this is often untrue.
Get Dan's (AC6LA) program at: http://ac6la.com/tldetails1.html and run some
examples.
for more on ladder line see: http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf
On 1/30/2017 9:00 PM, Barry wrote:
...I feed it with ladder line which has low loss even at absurdly high
My K3, S/N 7834 and has the newest
Softwareupdate. Power calibration with K3 Utility was enforced.No problem!
TX ALC ON. TECH MD OFF. External watt-meter LP100A.
Problem:
Power out adjust on 30 watts.
issue 1- The meter displayed 100 ..140 watts with the first dot.
Then, the
Hi Dave.
That's exactly what I need, thank you.
The panel sizes of the new and old are exactly the same. I guess with the
K144XV they just took the original panels and drilled the extra holes.
It's possible that the very late K3s and K3Ss already have the holes
drilled, but they're filled
Depends on your random wire and what band(s) you want to use. For some
bands the 9:1 "balun" (not used as a true balun in this case, since both
the coax and the random wire are unbalanced by nature) will step the
feedpoint impedance down to something that's a better match for the 50 ohm
coax,
44 matches
Mail list logo