+1 to this.
> On Nov 2, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Phil Genera wrote:
>
> I have neither a K4 nor a loop controller from Loftur[0], but my dream is
> adding an ethernet interface to the latter and controlling it from the
> former.
>
> [0]
> https://sites.google.com/site/lofturj/to-automatically-tune-a-m
Greetings,
Having purchased a KX2 for Camping, SOTA, etc, I’ve decided to list my KX3
(S/N 4190) for sale on eBay.
You can find it here: https://www.ebay.com/itm/233195652894
73,
Phil
KB1FIY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http:
While cleaning out a closet, I came across the Top Cover, Front Panel, and Heat
Sink panel from when I long ago built a KPA100 + KAT100-2 in an EC2.
They are in good condition. Find a picture here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/8377240@N08/28068372495/
They're free, just pay for postage from
I have several Rigol instruments, including the DS-1102D (2 Channel 100Mhz w/
16 Channel Logic Analyzer).
It's definitely been a useful investment and has performed very well for me.
--phil
On Sep 24, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Rick Stealey wrote:
>
> There was a company displaying at Dayton this yea
Greetings fellow Elecraft enthusiasts,
When I bought a K3 a year or so ago, I promised myself I'd fund the purchase
by selling my K2. I'm finally getting around to doing that.
I've posted it for auction on eBay, and with Eric's permission, posting the
description and auction link to the li
You can also install the chassis screws into the 2D connectors, which provide
something narrow enough for the Panavise PCB holder to latch on to. That's how
I did it, and it worked reasonably well.
--phil
On Dec 28, 2009, at 1:09 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Conway,
>
> Just my way of working, I
On Oct 13, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Julian, G4ILO wrote:
Although you don't anticipate adding more modules to it there might
be a
demand for an official version of the last digital interface board
that was
designed by the late Pauli Nunez EA3BLQ. Since a Li-Ion battery
option isn't
on the cards I
Thanks in no small part to the list and archives, Don / W3FPR, Steve/
N1JFU, and Jeff/W7BRS, K2 #6662 is fully calibrated and made it's
first contact today!
Incidentally, this was also my first ham radio contact (besides one or
two perhaps done with an elmer some 20 years ago).
Now to troubl
You
> can try adding or subtracting some feedline (1/8 wavelength at a
> time for the band having difficulty) to see if you can produce a
> better compromise antenna system input impedance.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> Phillip Heller wrote:
>> So I've completed the KAT
So I've completed the KAT2, so far so good.
I get C55 to 003 +/- 2 (bounces back and forth). R1 set per DL1
calculation, R2 set with matching wiper resistance.
CALS reports 1:1 on 80 and 40, though from 30 through 10 it reports
from 1.1:1 to 1.9:1 respectively.
The documentation says not to
How about 99.5% cotton, and .5% conductive threads, then a snap fitting near
the bottom. You know, take care of all of our ESD grounding needs at
once
:-)
--phil
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
>
> Knowing Wayne it'll come as a kit :-)
>
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV
> www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
>
> -
Just finished the KAT2 for K2 #6662.
Unfortunately, J8 is just too tight on CTRL P4. I *might* be able to
force it on, but it would never come off.
Anyone run into this?
--phil
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be
Hi there,
So, I've made it through Alignment/Test 2. All numbers right down
the middle, save the AGC threshold voltage, which was solved by adding
10k across Control RP6 pins 3&4.
So, I complete the S-Meter alignment per Alignment/Test 1. No problem.
Then, after I finished Alignment/Tes
Everything checks out per the Control Board resistance checks, though
U6 29 & 30 to Ground show 95-97k ohm (dependent upon dmm polarity).
So that's 5-7kohm greater than the range shown in the table, but less
than 10% deviation...
Is this something I should concern myself with?
--phil
___
Everything checks out per the Control Board resistance checks, though
U6 29 & 30 to Ground show 95-97k ohm (dependent upon dmm polarity).
So that's 5-7kohm greater than the range shown in the table, but less
than 10% deviation...
Is this something I should concern myself with?
--phil
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
