://g4fre.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/making-k3-internal-transverter-more.htm
l
Dave
G4FRE
--
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 14:18:36 -0500
From: "Jim Spears" <n...@cox.net>
To: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 + K144XV question
Message-ID: <03830
Jim,
The K144XV is natively a single antenna port transceiver.
But if you need separate TX and RX antenna connections for your
transverter, note that there is a jumper setting that can apply +5V on
the output coax during transmit - see page 21 of the K144XV instructions.
You should be able to
I believe the internal xvrtr routes the rcv antenna connection
through a header on the board and in normal operation, that is
jumpered. I would think you can remove the jumper and use the header
to make your receive connection
Ken
At 11:18 AM 1/1/2018, Jim Spears wrote:
Happy New Year to
Happy New Year to all!
I have a K3 with the internal K144XV 2m module. This works FB but both TX
and RX are on the same antenna port. In a configuration I am thinking of
using, there would be separate RX and TX lines.
With my main 2m EME station which uses a second K3 and a 10m to 2m
That raises the question as to how 146-148MHz will transmit inhibited as
would be a licensing requirement in some IARU Regions 1 3. Presumably
this will be possible via the CONFIG menu?
In a recent message, AD6XY m.j.wil...@rl.ac.uk wrote ...
I am wondering what to do with the unneeded
Yes, we can do this in firmware. On my list.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Dec 23, 2009, at 12:07 AM, David Pratt wrote:
That raises the question as to how 146-148MHz will transmit
inhibited as
would be a licensing requirement in some IARU Regions 1 3.
Presumably
this will be possible via the
Very interesting. Hopefully details on how to drive microwave gear to follow
too.
I am wondering what to do with the unneeded second crystal. There is no
need at all for 146-148 over here.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/k144xv-question-tp4205050p4206359.html
Sent from
7 matches
Mail list logo
