I'm sure I speak for many, and I would be very interested in a K3 if it has a
general coverage receiver.
That's the main reason I can't seriously consider a K2 to meet my needs. I
do a LOT of listening - far more than operating. So a compact mobile
transceiver MUST have a general coverage
And when it fails, good luck fixing it yourself! 8-)
And how about that terrible receiver front end?
Doug
W6JD
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure I speak for many, and I would be very interested in a K3 if it has a
general coverage receiver.
On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And when it fails, good luck fixing it yourself! 8-)
funny you should mention that! ... this was posted within the last
week on a QRP group's reflector.
~~
From QRPland; I made the fatal mistake of leaving my K-1 plugged in
and hooked
I can't imagine how many days or weeks of time and cost of shipping, labor, and
parts the same damage on a Kenwood 480 would be.
David, k3tue
.
--- Mark Bayern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And when it fails, good luck fixing it yourself!
--- DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the dream of a K3 is something necessary to the group.
I agree, because it is like a vehicle to get people to think about what they
wish they had or what they think is missing, which is valuable information for
any company.
What I find most
No hurry here for a K-3.
My new K-2 just now on the air.
#5604 is alive.
-W4SK
- Original Message -
From: David Toepfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Do you really need a K3?
--- DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL [EMAIL
But perhaps my needs are few. I just need a decent CW rig on 17/15/12/10/6 for
the upcoming sunspot cycle 24.
David, k3tue
.
--- David Toepfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the dream of a K3 is something necessary to the group.
I agree,
7 matches
Mail list logo
