From: "Dick Harms PA2DW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'S55M'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Ken G3WCS'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Elecraft XV144 and XV50 - TX No
Hi all,
If the K2 has positive IIP3 specifications on 28 MHz which I think it has
(though the measurements I have seen were all conducted on 14 MHz...), then
it is hard to believe the measurements of DF9IC are reflecting the true
situation.
The XV144 uses a TUF-1H which is a 17 dBm mixer, the fro
Adi,
No comment on the numbers they produced, but from Henning's comments about
the K2 - "worst receiver", "ridiculously high AGC threshold" and his stated
dislike of the variable crystal IF filter indicate to me that he either has
a strong bias against the K2s features or has it adjusted improper
-
From: "Ken G3WCS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 12:33 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft XV144 and XV50 - TX Noise and birdie
> Hello all,
>
> A few months back I put together the XV144 and XV50 transverters. Both
> work fine but following s
www.s55m.com/teh/K2930MP.jpg
and
http://www.s55m.com/teh/RXPN.gif
- Original Message -
From: "Ken G3WCS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 12:33 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft XV144 and XV50 - TX Noise and birdie
> Hello all,
>
> A few month
Hello all,
A few months back I put together the XV144 and XV50 transverters. Both
work fine but following some comments from very local stations I decided
to make one or two checks.
I am comparing these tranverters with my own original 144Mhz transverter
which I built about 15 years ago.
With n
6 matches
Mail list logo
