Hi Bert,
I have both the K2 and K3. I also operate almost 100% CW and in a casual
manner. I don't contest but, I work a lot of QRP. I had the same question
before I bought the K3. So, to answer your question based on casual
operating, I would say that there is little difference. I seem to
I'm contemplating replacing my K2/100's desktop companion, a Ten-Rec Jupiter,
with a K3/100. I operate 100% casual CW.
Does anybody feel that the K2's rcvr is equal to or better than that of the K3,
additional bells and whistles notwithstanding?
Vy 73 de Bert
WA2SI
...and all the pieces
Does anybody feel that the K2's rcvr is equal to or better than that of the
K3, additional bells and whistles notwithstanding?
Bert - There probably are some people, but if so they have never operated a K3.
I have had a K2 as
well as my K3 and in my opinion there are only 3 advantage of
have the bragging right of having almost
as good a receiver as a K3 which you soldered together.
See the ARRL and Sherwood specs on the Elecraft page.
Ariel NY4G
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:11:52 -0500
From: wa...@arrl.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 vs. K3 Rcvr
I'm
. Lester Freamon, BPD
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE smartphone
- Reply message -
From: Rick Stealey rstea...@hotmail.com
To: wa...@arrl.net, elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 vs. K3 Rcvr
Date: Mon, Feb 20, 2012 06:21
Does anybody feel that the K2's rcvr is equal
Bert - From a purely technical / functional standpoint (i.e. numbers), and
aside from current drain and bells/whistles, the K3's receiver has the
edge, and I think most would agree.
The K2's receiver is superb, and I occasionally try to make it my only rig
by putting the K3 aside for a few days
6 matches
Mail list logo
