Hi Wayne,
Wayne Burdick schrieb am 29 Sep 2009 um 10:29:
> We've had many requests to provide an 0.5-kHz VFO tuning step size in SSB
> modes. I'd like to substitute this for the current 2.5 kHz selection. The
> new set of steps sizes for SSB would then be:
>
>0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0
>
> Most
Julian G5ILO wrote:
... so many people
nowadays use transceivers with a high degree of frequency accuracy and tend
to pick a frequency with all zeros in the last 3 digits. I don't think that
means we've all turned into CB good buddies either. ;)
-
No, but it is a bit
Dave G4AON wrote:
>
> Mike are you using the RIT/XIT control as a means of rapid tuning? On
> 80m SSB I can cross the band in less than two full turns of that knob,
> and on CW it does 300 KHz in 6 turns or so, how quickly do you need to
> tune?
>
I won't miss 2.5kHz, though I don't envisage u
Mike are you using the RIT/XIT control as a means of rapid tuning? On
80m SSB I can cross the band in less than two full turns of that knob,
and on CW it does 300 KHz in 6 turns or so, how quickly do you need to tune?
73 Dave, G4AON
K3/100 #80
---
This is the one aspect of the K3 I
This is the one aspect of the K3 I find frustrating. To QSY a few hundered
kHz takes a lot of turning. I really like the way some radios speed up the
tuning rate as you turn the dial faster. I use the RIT tuning very often to
QSY quickly and for larger steps I end up having to use DFE which is ted
We've had many requests to provide an 0.5-kHz VFO tuning step size in
SSB modes. I'd like to substitute this for the current 2.5 kHz
selection. The new set of steps sizes for SSB would then be:
0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0
Most operators probably don't find 2.5 kHz steps to be particularly
useful.
6 matches
Mail list logo