Jack Smith wrote:
In contrast, the K3, as I understand it, take an IF sample ahead of the IF
filter, with a source follower. Hence, a signal injected into the source
follower's output will leak back into the main IF path and be heard in the
receiver, reduced by the reverse gain of the source f
Don,
I have my softrock kit mounted in its own cabinent. I was able to hook
the softrock kit right to the 940 IF output - the signal level from
the 940 was ok and I don't have any evidence of softrock osc.
artifacts getting back into the 940's IF stage. I actually even have a
preamp
inline betwee
Don Rasmussen wrote:
Scott,
Did your TS940 require any kind of a special buffer
circuit to keep the softrock lite from injecting noise
into the IF, as the K3 might require?
--------
[Elecraft] K3 and SDR Integration - Almost
completed!!!
Scott McClements kc2pih at
Scott,
Did your TS940 require any kind of a special buffer
circuit to keep the softrock lite from injecting noise
into the IF, as the K3 might require?
[Elecraft] K3 and SDR Integration - Almost
completed!!!
Scott McClements kc2pih at gmail.com
Tue Jul
But you know the PowerSDR code. I just have so much in progress at the
moment that opening up the PowerSDR source would fry my brain. FWIW I now
have a TCP/IP DLL which interfaces to HRD.
Anyway - congrats - I have to do nothing, but I'll still wait for the box
with the Elecraft approved stick
I personally think that going the SDR route is overkill - and requires a ton
of code.
Simon! I can't believe what I am hearing from you! :)
In about a months time, I went into the PowerSDR code (v1.9.1) and
interfaced it to your Ham Radio Deluxe using DDE. I have the PowerSDR
software sync'd p
6 matches
Mail list logo
