Steve,
The manual differs from the schematic, and I would strongly suggest that
the schematic is correct. RTS is on pin 7 and DTR is on pin 4 according
to the schematic.
Second question: If your computer application puts the FSK data on TxD,
then yes, you add an RS-232 to TTL conversion st
Hi,
Page 18 of my K3 manual shows the breakout for the RS232 connector. It says
pin 6 is RTS. I thought RTS was on pin 7 in the standard DB9 configuration.
Second question: The manual is clear that pin 1 of the Aux I/O connector is
for FSK IN. Does that mean that I run my computer's RS
Let's end this thread for now.
We are shipping printed manuals in the box with every K3.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
--
Julian G4ILO wrote:
I don't agree. Printing it yourself for most people would take a long
time, cost more than a mass-reproduced manual, use twice as much paper
(most hams don't ha
In a message dated 10/11/07 4:20:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> (most hams don't have office-type printers that will print on both
> sides)
I don't know any printer that won't print on both sides. Of course it may
take two passes through the printer, but that's why t
I don't agree. Printing it yourself for most people would take a long
time, cost more than a mass-reproduced manual, use twice as much paper
(most hams don't have office-type printers that will print on both
sides) and not be bound.
Nor would updating be any easier unless the manual was structured
I'm glad you're not in charge, then.:) Some (many?) of us only have
cheap, slow home inkjet printers that use very expensive ink
cartridges and it would take a long time and be prohibitively
expensive to print off a manual. And I don't want to turn on a
computer every time I want to look up somethi
Craig, we're really not that far apart here.
It's prohibitively expensive and adds significant complications for
the manufacturer, who has to maintain revision information per-page.
Maintaining revision information for updated pages is trivial. Adobe
FrameMaker makes this easy even without us
In a message dated 10/10/07 5:50:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What's wrong with doing it that way? There must be something wrong with it,
>
> because nobody in the ham world is doing it. Would most hams not like such a
>
> manual scheme? I sure would.
>
In my wo
> What's wrong with doing it that way? There must be something wrong with
> it, because nobody in the ham world is doing it. Would most hams not
> like such a manual scheme? I sure would.
It's prohibitively expensive and adds significant complications for the
manufacturer, who has to maintain re
Craig D. Smith wrote:
I guess the options would be . . . making
the pages replaceable individually in some
kind of attractive and convenient sized
binder system. Any thoughts?
Yeah. That, what you said. :-)
The manuals I've obtained for some of my boatanchor (military) equipment are
loose-
Great news on the K3 manual being put up on the website sometime this week.
I know it will be excellent based on my experience with the K1 and K2
manuals. But it prompts me to ask a question I've been wondering about
lately.
How does Elecraft plan to handle updates to the manual so that it keeps
11 matches
Mail list logo
