-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Gilbert
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:06 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 possible new option
Yes, Brian explained in a private message that that was
Yes, Brian explained in a private message that that was part of his
concern. It sounds like he actually wants two independent transceivers
since he wants to be able to transmit on either. There are some
admittedly clunky ways around that as well, though.
http://www.ab7e.com/cross_band_spli
Brian may be referring the low-pass filters on the main antenna path?
i.e. the condition that leads to a "USE AUX" message when placing the
sub on a higher band than the main
73,
~iain / N6ML
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> The K3's sub receiver i
et
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 possible new option
I don't understand. What is it that you think you own?
73,
Dave AB7E
On 8/20/2013 8:16 AM, Brian Alsop wrote:
> I was hoping that we would truly have a two RX K3-- each with its own set
I don't understand. What is it that you think you own?
73,
Dave AB7E
On 8/20/2013 8:16 AM, Brian Alsop wrote:
I was hoping that we would truly have a two RX K3-- each with its own
set of bandpass filters when configured as independent.
Perhaps the space where the general coverage filters
On Aug 20, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
> It also has an identical sub receiver and DSP.
Typo I meant "an identical synth" and DSP.
Wayne
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Hi Brian,
The K3's sub receiver is identical to the main receiver. The sub has its own
set of ham-band band-pass filters, its own optional KBPF3 option
(general-coverage filters), and up to five crystal filters. It also has an
identical sub receiver and DSP. It is literally the same as the main
I was hoping that we would truly have a two RX K3-- each with its own
set of bandpass filters when configured as independent.
Perhaps the space where the general coverage filters are now could be
utilized for a second set of filters for the sub receiver.
If I want general coverage, I'll get a
8 matches
Mail list logo
