All,
I know I started this thread, but it has gone way off topic. I merely was
looking for why the KPA500 is technically superior to comparable, less
expensive, solid state amps by other manufacturers. There has become too
much discussion now on why we should or shouldn't use amps, QRP/QRO, etc.
every radio
having its own dedicated linear amplifier.
TNX & 73,
Johnny VR2XMC
寄件人﹕ ai6ii
收件人﹕ Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2011/6/22 (三) 7:58:54 AM
主題： [Elecraft] KPA500 vs others
Ditto Except in my case I was 16 in 1963 when first licensed and I
For me it was 1958, age 11. My first station was a Viking Adventurer and
HQ-110 (had it for 12 years). Never touched anything more sophisticated
until I upgraded (in 1970) to an HW-100 (used it for 12 years, too). In
the early 1990s, I got into restoring and operating "vintage gear." I had
several
Ditto Except in my case I was 16 in 1963 when first licensed and I have
less in the way of DXer antennas and much less in DXer skills (although I am
getting better). The K-line is my Collins substitute. I had to buy an LDG
AT-1000Pro to handle the KPA500, so I won't really have a complete K-lin
Others can argue the tech. advantages pro or con. Some feel they need
2 KW. I don't.. For a DXer antennas & skill are more important than a
few more watts. I like the way it works with my K3. I've had less
than stellar dealings with the Asian companies. Whether it's bias on my
part or not
5 matches
Mail list logo
