In a message dated 6/10/07 9:35:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:30:57 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >The Soviets used tubes in their electronics back then.
> >because their available industrial resources couldn't
> >make and support solid-state
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:30:57 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The Soviets used tubes in their electronics back then.
>because their available industrial resources couldn't
>make and support solid-state electronics of the type needed.
>They could have imported all the solid-state devices needed,
>but
In a message dated 6/9/07 5:37:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You got to admit - this
> dwarfs the freedom antennas of VOA.
Well, maybe.
But it doesn't dwarf the antennas of NAA (Cutler, ME) or SAQ (Grimeton,
Sweden), or many others.
What's unique about it is the
This was supposedly, part of their early warning
over-the-horizon ICBM missle tracking, missle
attack alert system. You got to admit - this
dwarfs the freedom antennas of VOA. Wow,
RF antenna-design must be in solid shape
in Russia. When I learned Karnaugh Mapping
in school - they used to talk a
See Google translation below. Much additional text after
clicking each thumbnail'
73, Bill W4ZV
http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpripyat.com%2Fru%2Finternet_photo%2Fchernobyl_2%2F1%2F&langpair=ru%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8
___
http://pripyat.com/ru/internet_photo/chernobyl_2/1/
I'm just blown away at the scale of this thing (450 feet tall).
My last post on this
de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to t
6 matches
Mail list logo
