s quite unlikly because that kind of fault would drag the
receiver
way down too.
73,
Don W3FPR
-Original Message-
From: Larry Phipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 dead
r is quite unlikly because that kind of fault would drag the
receiver
way down too.
73,
Don W3FPR
-Original Message-
From: Larry Phipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 dead
TECTED]
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 dead xmtr
Hi Don. The levels are high everywhere in the chain up through the bases
of Q7-8. Requested power is immaterial in this case, since the ALC sees
zero detected power, and therefore is pegged at 5v all the time.
I measured the lev
h.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 dead xmtr
>
>
>
> Hi Don. The levels are high everywhere in the chain up through the bases
> of Q7-8. Requested power is immaterial in this case, since the ALC sees
> zero detected power, and therefore is pegged at 5v all the time.
>
&g
Hi Don. The levels are high everywhere in the chain up through the bases
of Q7-8. Requested power is immaterial in this case, since the ALC sees
zero detected power, and therefore is pegged at 5v all the time.
I measured the levels with a scope, and divided the p-p values by 2.82
to compare
Larry,
Exactly where are the RF levels higher than normal? Obviously not at the
output of the Low Pass filter or you would have power output (unless you
have the tuner and have set it to ANT2 instead of ANT1 or something like
that).
With the requested power set at 5 watts, send us the RF Voltage
6 matches
Mail list logo
