RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-12 Thread Benny Aumala
Q: When QRP is great? A: Every time! I have K2 but work with 5W or 500mW. 170 countries 5W and 70 with 20...500mW. The difference is the same to HiPower boys whatever sunspot number. It just need your equipment been correct and some additional operator skill. For PROSIGN CONFUSION: I think

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-12 Thread Stuart Rohre
L. B. Cebik reports favorably on vertical dipoles at Cebik.com. When elevated sufficiently; since they are a complete antenna, not requiring a radial set; they radiate quite well at DX angles. See www.cebik.com -Stuart K5KVH ___ Elecraft mailing

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Stuart, K5KVH wrote: L. B. Cebik reports favorably on vertical dipoles at Cebik.com. When elevated sufficiently; since they are a complete antenna, not requiring a radial set; they radiate quite well at DX angles. - You are missing the fact that

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Robert Tellefsen
Keith I run only wire antennas here with my 5w K2. Plus a 50 ft vertical on 160m. With the K2 at 5w, I have 160m QRP WAS, so you can have a lot of fun with 5w on the low bands. You do have to be a bit creative with your antennas to wring out the last drop of performance from them, but to me,

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread vze3v8dt
Hi Keith, During the solar minimum the higher frequencies don't open as often or for as long, that is 10 15m. I find that 20m and 17m are open nearly every day and are both great bands for making QRP QSOs, and similarly I use mostly 17m while HF mobile (I estimate that the poor mobile

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread vze3v8dt
BTW, last night 160m sounded pretty good. I didn't have time to spend on the radio but I did work my second European DX with 5W from my K2. I worked G3PQA (I think that was it, my memory may not be 100% since I'm in a training course today). Apparently he is a fairly big Top Band station.

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Vic K2VCO
Darwin, Keith wrote: How limiting will 5 or 10 watts (even with that Elecraft Mojo) be under current conditions? Are we entering into conditions where QRP with simple antennas will become rather frustrating? Is it K2/100 time? You can still make plenty of contacts with 10 watts. During the

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Keith, KD1E wrote: K1 or K2. Hmmm, the debate continues. But wait, we're approaching a sunspot min. My antennas are pretty limited. I have a 28 foot vertical (fed with a tuner near the base) for 40 thru 15 and a dipole at 25 feet but that is about it. No towers, no high wires, no yagis.

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Tom Althoff
Keith - I was reading that the predicted low of the current cycle supposedly takes place this September. Using my K1 @ 5W there has been an opening to Europe every day for the past two weeks on 15MI was impressed that there were any stations outside of the usual North/South paths during

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Stephen W. Kercel
Keith: As you have no doubt seen from the other posts, you can do a lot with QRP on the low bands. As is clear from such feats as working intercontinental DX with 5 W on 160 m, QRP is limiting, but not severely so. I've done some NVIS calculations for New England. If you're interested in

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Ed - K9EW
Fear not the sunspot cycle, Darwin. In the past 18 months, I have completed WAS with 5w and a dipole. I currently have 49 states with 1 watt, and 44 states with 100mW. I think I enjoy the challenge of the sunspot trough more than shooting fish in a barrel during the sunspot peak. The feeling

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread ROBERT CARROLL
Mackenzie-Kennedy Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:07 PM To: Darwin, Keith Cc: Elecraft Discussion List Subject: Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min? Keith, If you want to hear how strong signals from a 100, 10 , 1 or 0.1 watt transmitter can be in real time, take a listen

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Darwin, Keith
Thanks for the replies. Much of it is info that I do already know, having worked QRP for a number of years. The thing I DON'T have is the experience of working QRP during various phases of the sunspot cycle. My ham activity has always gone in blips and blops and has been mostly out of phase with

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Paul Meier
All the DX is still out there, it's just quieter! Paul K7PM ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread BPCI
In a message dated 1/11/2006 1:27:55 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fear not the sunspot cycle, Darwin. In the past 18 months, I have completed WAS with 5w and a dipole. I currently have 49 states with 1 watt, and 44 states with 100mW. Well, I guess that ends me

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Larry Makoski W2LJ
Darwin, Keith wrote: K1 or K2. Hmmm, the debate continues. But wait, we're approaching a sunspot min. My antennas are pretty limited. I have a 28 foot vertical (fed with a tuner near the base) for 40 thru 15 and a dipole at 25 feet but that is about it. No towers, no high wires, no yagis.

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Tony Morgan
K9QRG ON 5/12? Just checking :) Tony W7GO - Original Message - From: Larry Makoski W2LJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darwin, Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min? Darwin

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Stephen W. Kercel
that they could share? Thanks, Kevin N8IQ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Morgan Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:39 PM To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min? K9QRG ON 5/12? Just checking :) Tony W7GO

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Larry Phipps
solar cycle min? K9QRG ON 5/12? Just checking :) Tony W7GO - Original Message - From: Larry Makoski W2LJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darwin, Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle

Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Stephen W. Kercel
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:39 PM To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min? K9QRG ON 5/12? Just checking :) Tony W7GO - Original Message - From: Larry Makoski W2LJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darwin, Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent

RE: [Elecraft] QRP viability during solar cycle min?

2006-01-11 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Kevin N8IQ wrote: I've been playing around with EZNEC trying to come up with a DX antenna that will work at my QTH. The vertical dipole seems to have a fantastic pattern for DX with low takeoff angles. I may be able to hang a vertical wire dipole in one of my trees and have it nearly invisible.