RE: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-04-01 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
ent call. Ron AC7AC -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod It's not that 3ms is a lot of time i

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod topic

2008-04-01 Thread R. Kevin Stover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I agree John. The list moderators have asked, on several occasions, for people to put the model of elecraft product in the subject line. It was suggested that doing this would allow people to use the filtering capabilities of their mail clients to so

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod topic

2008-04-01 Thread John R. Lonigro
Hi everyone: I have Thunderbird check for the magic characters "K3" in the subject. When they are found, those emails are put into a separate folder. Not owning a K3, that makes it easier for me to quickly scan through topics that probably aren't of interest to me. Some folks don't bother to

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-31 Thread AJSOENKE
al Message - From: "Lyle Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Elecraft Reflector" Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod >> Or do Rev A RF boards have a lower value for C222 than that shown on the >> schemati

RE: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Reiser Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:33 PM To: Lyle Johnson; Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod People, 8 ms.- 5 ms.= 3 ms., does it matter in any practical sense? I would really like to know who cares, and why? Can anyon

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread John Reiser
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Elecraft Reflector" Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 5:21 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod Or do Rev A RF boards have a lower value for C222 than that shown on the schematic? Early production K3 RF boards have a 1 uF capacitor instead of a 0.1 uF c

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Vic K2VCO
David Pratt wrote: Elecraft says. "Some owners prefer a faster CW keying waveform rise time. The rise time can be reduced from about 8 milliseconds to 5 milliseconds without affecting the fall time by replacing capacitor C222 on the K3 main RF board with a 0.1 uF capacitor. This change wil

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Joseph Trombino Jr
Measured C222 in my K3 s/n 285 a while back and it is .1uf. 73, Joe W2KJ QRP, therefore I am ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to t

RE: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Oops, make that originally a 1 uFD cap at C222. Now the recommended value is 0.1 uFd Ron -Original Message- From: Ron D'Eau Claire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 2:26 PM To: 'David Pratt'; 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: RE: [Elecra

RE: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Hi, David: The original value for C222 was 0.01 uF. Wayne asked that it be changed to 0.1 uFd. I wasn't privy to the source of the comment that the rise time might be further shortened in firmware. If Wayne plans to control the keying in firmware, it's probably important that all the hardware be

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Ken Wagner K3IU
I guess I didn't say... my K3 is #202 73, Ken KIU Don Ehrlich wrote: That was me .. My actual measurement was 0.985 microfarad when I checked the RF board in S/N 195 I rounded it up to 1 microfarad in my earlier report. Don K7FJ Someone else here mentioned that C222 was 1 uF, but I don

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Lyle Johnson
Or do Rev A RF boards have a lower value for C222 than that shown on the schematic? Early production K3 RF boards have a 1 uF capacitor instead of a 0.1 uF capacitor installed at C222. Yes, the published schematics show a 0.1 uF capacitor. The effect of the larger capacitor is to increase th

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Don Ehrlich
That was me .. My actual measurement was 0.985 microfarad when I checked the RF board in S/N 195 I rounded it up to 1 microfarad in my earlier report. Don K7FJ Someone else here mentioned that C222 was 1 uF, but I don't remember who it was. 73, Ken K3IU ___

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread David Pratt
In a recent message, Ken Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes I measured C222 *in place* with my aade cap checker and it measured ~1 uF(actually 0.965 uF)... not the 0.1 in the schematic. I'm guessing that the schematic available for download is not current with production. Someone else here menti

Re: [Elecraft] CW rise time mod

2008-03-29 Thread Ken Wagner
Hi David: I measured C222 *in place* with my aade cap checker and it measured ~1 uF(actually 0.965 uF)... not the 0.1 in the schematic. I'm guessing that the schematic available for download is not current with production. Someone else here mentioned that C222 was 1 uF, but I don't remember