I read years ago that speech processors like pre-emphasized audio
(louder highs, quieter lows). And the heavier the processing the more
pre-emphasis is optimum. Does anyone know if the K3 speech processor
does that automatically?
Al N1AL
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:52, Brendan Minish wrote:
> On
an.qth.net
Subject: Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)
> I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit
> a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from
> "their" channel.
I personally would not inte
At 08:28 AM 2/14/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
This is why you want to have a signal with a very high average power
level, but one which is also not wider than necessary.
That sounds like CW. :-)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mail
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit
a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from
"their" channel.
I personally would not intentionally transmit a "wide" signal during a
contest. It would, imho, be counterproductive, apart from any other
re
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a
wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from "their" channel.
Ahmust be one of those "advance the technology" things that justify
contestsgood for everyo
> I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a
> wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from "their" channel.
David
G3UNA
>
> >
> Within the context of SSB useage in ham radio I believe that the 'hype about
> audio' could lead to another related proble
Thanks for posting your interesting comments Brendan.
Within the context of SSB useage in ham radio I believe that the 'hype about
audio' could lead to another related problem, if not already existing, which
is poor use of the HF spectrum available to us. Given the proven fact that a
SSB trans
7 matches
Mail list logo
