At 10:38 PM 5/12/2006, Simmons, Forest wrote:
So most of the time, in the context of Candidate Published
Orderings, Concorcet will yield an unambiguous social ordering of
the candidates, with no cycles to resolve.
More importantly (and precisely) it means that if the four
candidates
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 10:38 PM 5/12/2006, Simmons, Forest wrote:
-snip-
So most of the time, in the context of Candidate Published Orderings,
Concorcet will
yield an unambiguous social ordering of the candidates, with no cycles to
resolve.
-snip-
I would say that's amazing, and
Here's another simple voting method:
Prior to the election, each candidate publishes
a list of approved candidates.
On election day, each voter selects a candidate.
Each vote is tallied as if the voter had approved
each candidate listed by the selected candidate.
The
Ralph Suter wrote:
On May 4, Steve Eppley wrote:
Could Article I. Section 10 of the US Constitution interfere with that
scheme?
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty
of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace,
enter into any Agreement or Compact
At 01:47 PM 5/13/2006, Steve Eppley wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 10:38 PM 5/12/2006, Simmons, Forest wrote:
-snip-
So most of the time, in the context of Candidate Published
Orderings, Concorcet will
yield an unambiguous social ordering of the candidates, with no
cycles to
