Yum! Tastes like chicken.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> Free-range voting?
Brian Olson
http://bolson.org/
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
Free-range voting?
--
/Jonathan Lundell.
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
"free voting" does indeed have nice connotations in the free-as-in-freedom
way. Free can also mean unrestricted and unregulated and someone specially
cynical might take that to mean we're free to stuff the ballot box. :-/
Outside this list, I've been plugging "rankings and ratings ballots" as
t
My comments are about computers and programs; not about this election method.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:49:51 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anthony O'Neal wrote:
>
...
>
>>The sequential method is vulnerable to vote management and introduces
>>tactical voting into it.
>>
>
> The non-sequenti
Anthony O'Neal wrote:
> >
> > Tactical voting works against that. If people tactical vote, then
they
> > get
> >
> > no method to express their actual desired.
> >
> >
>
> I don't think you understand the method. It was a very short
description,
> but PAV is not vulnerable to tactical voting a
On 6/13/06, Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:45 -0500 Dan Bishop wrote:
>
> > Dave Ketchum wrote:
> >
> >> Permitting equal ranking for multiple candidates. Desirable for
> >>pleasing those who call Approval desirable; doable with Condorcet, though
> >>there
On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Anthony O'Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write:
> And about the proportional range system I talked about earlier, theworkings> of the system is obvious. Under PAV rules, you assume that candidatesgive 1> point to an outcome for having one approved
Anthony O'Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write:
> And about the proportional range system I talked about earlier, the
workings
> of the system is obvious. Under PAV rules, you assume that candidates
give 1
> point to an outcome for having one approved of candidate, 1/3 for the
second
> approved of can
