In my world, everyone eligible has to vote.
So as not to introduce junk data into the system, 'truncation' or
otherwise casting an incomplete vote is allowed.
You may even cast a blank ballot.
I like the social responsibility of voting. Everyone should do it. And if
people don't want any of t
I'm proud to offer a much updated set of election method implementations.
http://bolson.org/voting/vote_util/
Mostly it's the basic set of VRR, IRV, IRNR, Raw Rating Summation and a
Histogram utility implemented across Java, C, C++ and perl.
STV is also implemented in Java and C.
Java, C and p
Yum! Tastes like chicken.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> Free-range voting?
Brian Olson
http://bolson.org/
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
"free voting" does indeed have nice connotations in the free-as-in-freedom
way. Free can also mean unrestricted and unregulated and someone specially
cynical might take that to mean we're free to stuff the ballot box. :-/
Outside this list, I've been plugging "rankings and ratings ballots" as
t
Yup.
http://betterpolls.com/et?vrr=-clist&if=-d&cand=4&seats=1&data=F%3ES%3EP%3DB%0D%0AP%3EB%3EF%3DS%0D%0AS%3EP%3EF%3DB%0D%0AP%3ES%3EF%3DB%0D%0AF%3ES%3EP%3DB%0D%0AF%3DS%3DP%3DB
6 votes is a kinda small sample (5 really, a=b=c=d is pretty much
abstention).
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
This discussion sounds like what I encountered in Computer Science under
the topics of computability and computational complexity.
I think we can safely say that a good election method is an algorithm that
executes in bounded time. An election method should not be an exercise in
solving the Hal
To answer my own question, I think the attached perl script nicely shows
the difference between std-dev and gini by this output:
data: 1, 2, 3, 4
std: 1.29099444873581
gini: 0.25
data: 1, 1, 1, 9
std: 4
gini: 0.5
data: 1, 1, 1, 999
std: 499
gini: 0.747005988023952
data: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jobst Heitzig wrote:
> a week ago I suggested using social welfare functions (such as the Gini
> welfare function) to evaluate election methods.
I have also been trying to run simulations that count up the social
welfare, but my initial results caused me to doubt my impleme
Ooo, I like it. Now I want to re-run all my old simulations that just
measured average happiness.
Though, the tricky thing I've always run into when trying to formulate a
better social utility measure is that when trying to make sure no one is
left too far behind, do we unfairly reward people w
Here it is folks, the one we've been waiting for:
http://www.ci.burlington.vt.us/ct/elections/
A real live IRV election, run last Tuesday, and different methods give
different results.
The raw data can be downloaded here:
http://www.burlingtonvotes.org/20060307/
I've adapted the data and run
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tallying with lots of methods is nice, but kinda hard on the implementer.
> I've implemented half a dozen methods myself in my C/C++/Java/Perl code
> (which I ought to update the availability of, it should go up at
> http://bolson.org/voting/dist/ ). I
Being an implementation wonk as I am, I comment...
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Warren Smith wrote:
> Second, I do not like negative numbers as votes. They are confusing.
> Make it 0 to 10 not -5 to +5, say.
I disagree. I think negative and positive numbers map quite naturally to
dislike and like degre
12 matches
Mail list logo