Re: [EM] ICT doesn't meaningfully fail CC. CC isn't meaningfully incompatible with FBC.

2012-07-29 Thread Michael Ossipoff
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jameson Quinn wrote: > Can you give a specific example where ICT fails the conventional CC, and > your argument why that isn't "meaningful"? The words below don't add up to > anything for me, so I think I need a concrete example. I'll give a numerical example, if

[EM] Implementing a democratic electoral process (once it is conceived)

2012-07-29 Thread Michael Allan
If it is not too early, then I have some questions about the practical problem of actually implementing a reformed electoral process. Fred Gohlke said on July 27: > re [Juho]: "If the second phase is a traditional election, > traditional financing practices may apply." > > That is one of se

Re: [EM] ICT doesn't meaningfully fail CC. CC isn't meaningfully incompatible with FBC.

2012-07-29 Thread Jameson Quinn
Can you give a specific example where ICT fails the conventional CC, and your argument why that isn't "meaningful"? The words below don't add up to anything for me, so I think I need a concrete example. Jameson 2012/7/29 Michael Ossipoff > Suppose you rank X and Y both in 1st place. > > You do

[EM] IC-Smith-T, IC-Schwartz-T, Double-Ended IC-Smith-T, Double-Ended IC-Schwartz-T

2012-07-29 Thread Michael Ossipoff
I mentioned Double-Ended ICT as an enhancement of ICT. Here's another possibility: If no one is unbeaten, then you could do the top-count for winner only among the Smith set or the Schwartz set. Someone asked me which criteria ICT meets, other than the properties for which I value it. For one thi