[mailto:da...@clarityconnect.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 5:55 PM
To: Paul Kislanko
Cc: 'Kristofer Munsterhjelm'; election-meth...@electorama.com
Subject: Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Paul Kislanko wrote:
> On 04/29/2012 04:48 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Paul Kislanko wrote:
On 04/29/2012 04:48 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Computers do well at performing the tasks they are properly told to
perform - better than humans given the same directions. Thus it would
make sense to direct the computers and expect them to do what is
On 04/29/2012 04:48 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
> Computers do well at performing the tasks they are properly told to
> perform - better than humans given the same directions. Thus it would
> make sense to direct the computers and expect them to do what is
> needed accurately.
>
> Still, we sometime
On 04/29/2012 04:48 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Computers do well at performing the tasks they are properly told to
perform - better than humans given the same directions. Thus it would
make sense to direct the computers and expect them to do what is needed
accurately.
Still, we sometimes wonder exa
o:election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com
] On Behalf Of Michael Ossipoff
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 9:55 PM
To: election-meth...@electorama.com
Subject: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts
Dave:
You said:
And that gets to why I think "hand counting" is no longer useful as
"verific
I told the machine was my vote.
From: election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com
[mailto:election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ossipoff
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 9:55 PM
To: election-meth...@electorama.com
Subject: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts
Dave:
Dave:
You said:
And that gets to why I think "hand counting" is no longer useful as
"verification" - what is there to "hand count" when there are no paper
ballots except those printed by the machines that we're auditing?
[endquote]
Handcounting was used even before there were voting machines!
