On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Juho Laatu juho.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2.6.2011, at 19.10, Peter Zbornik wrote:
Hi Juho,
I am sending a two corrections:
I wrote below:
Rule 2 (from the generalized ballot):
A winning candidate needs to be explicitly ranked on 50% of the ballots.
On 31.5.2011, at 12.58, Peter Zbornik wrote:
That would be, I think the smallest improvement on IRV, which could make a
positive change in real life and would support centrist candidates.
From the Condorcet criterion point of view, the Condorcet winner is a good,
often centrist candidate. If
Juho,
comments in the text below.
Mostly details.
Below I propose a new election method using IRV, which is closer to
Condorcet than regular IRV and would have elected Montroll in Burlington.
Method:
If the IRV winner doesn't get 50% of the votes (including blank ballots or
write-in candidates)
Peter Zbornik wrote:
Juho,
summarize my argument concerning generalized ballot and generalized
ballot completion and in the end of this email I suggest a new
single-member Condorcet election system.
Nomenclature: I think that null-candidate (marked X) is a fitting
name for voting for not
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_el...@lavabit.com wrote:
Peter Zbornik wrote:
Juho,
summarize my argument concerning generalized ballot and generalized
ballot completion and in the end of this email I suggest a new single-member
Condorcet election system.
Juho,
summarize my argument concerning generalized ballot and generalized ballot
completion and in the end of this email I suggest a new single-member
Condorcet election system.
Nomenclature: I think that null-candidate (marked X) is a fitting name
for voting for not filling a seat. The other
On 30.5.2011, at 18.41, Peter Zbornik wrote:
Juho,
summarize my argument concerning generalized ballot and generalized ballot
completion and in the end of this email I suggest a new single-member
Condorcet election system.
Nomenclature: I think that null-candidate (marked X) is a
Dear all,
please let me just add an extension of the proposed generalized ballot
completion in my email below.
Adding blank votes amounts to enabling the voter express zero preferences.
Leaving out candidates from the ranking allows for negative preferences.
However the negative preferences are
On 29.5.2011, at 16.06, Peter Zbornik wrote:
On the other hand I might rather prefer My Political Opponent to be elected
than Pol Pot.
Thus a ballot on the form AXMy Political OpponentPol Pot, might be a good
idea to allow.
I like this kind of explicit cutoffs more than implicit ones (at
Dear all,
I apologise for some less fortunate attempts to resolve the problem of the
generalized incomplete ballot.
Now I think I have finally arrived at a good unified treatment the problem,
generalized symmetric ballot completion, which respects the power of the
blank vote to block elections
10 matches
Mail list logo
