At 10:56 AM 4/23/2010, Jameson Quinn wrote:
[I'd written:}
About a century ago, a proposal was made in a major western U.S.
city to have a city council where each member exercised, in the
council, the number of votes they got in the election.
Which city? When?
Well, I couldn't find it. Port
> About a century ago, a proposal was made in a major western U.S. city to
> have a city council where each member exercised, in the council, the number
> of votes they got in the election.
>
>
Which city? When?
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
At 12:16 AM 4/23/2010, Michael Allan wrote:
Duane Johnson wrote:
> This sounds quite interesting, Abd ul-Rahman. Where can I learn
> about your FA/DP idea? ... (I know about delegable proxy, but
> haven't heard about FA/DP specifically).
DP may have other applications, too, aside from FA.
T
Good Morning, Duane
I think your idea of formulating a political process that is based on
listening to the views of the people is important. However,
accomplishing such an end is non-trivial.
Raph Frank did a good job of critiquing your proposal, so I won't repeat
his effort. However, I ur
Andrew Myers wrote:
On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
However, I strongly urge people who attempt to analyze the situation
and to propose reforms to:
1. Keep it simple. An extraordinarily powerful system for fully
proportional representation consisting of a seemingly-simple tweak
Duane Johnson wrote:
> This sounds quite interesting, Abd ul-Rahman. Where can I learn
> about your FA/DP idea? ... (I know about delegable proxy, but
> haven't heard about FA/DP specifically).
DP may have other applications, too, aside from FA. Here's a proposal
for primary elections and prima
At 09:07 PM 4/21/2010, Duane Johnson wrote:
This sounds quite interesting, Abd ul-Rahman. Where can I learn
about your FA/DP idea? Your discussion here is helpful, but I feel
like I am missing out the important prerequisite pieces in order to
make sense of it. (I know about delegable proxy,
At 05:23 PM 4/21/2010, Terry Bouricius wrote:
Abd has made much of a proposal of Charles Dodgson tweaking STV by
allowing candidates to assign exhausted ballots...but that is NOT
the system that Dodgson's name is normally attached to. His name is
attached to a Condorcet method (but not knowing
On Apr 20, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Raph Frank wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Duane Johnson > wrote:
The voting process would go like this:
1. (By some process outside the scope of this proposal), it is
determined
that an issue needs to be voted on
This could be an issue, as controllin
There is no rush, of course. I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
Thanks,
Duane Johnson
On Apr 21, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Fred Gohlke wrote:
Good Morning, Duane Johnson
I plan to study your proposal but have not had time to do so. I
expect to have questions for you and will post them as so
This sounds quite interesting, Abd ul-Rahman. Where can I learn about
your FA/DP idea? Your discussion here is helpful, but I feel like I
am missing out the important prerequisite pieces in order to make
sense of it. (I know about delegable proxy, but haven't heard about
FA/DP specifical
that this would result in "no election."
Terry
- Original Message -
From: Jameson Quinn
To: Andrew Myers
Cc: election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [EM] Idea Proposal: Listening Democracy
2010/4/21 Andrew My
Dodgson came up with Asset Voting, and I'm sure that is what Lomax was
referring to, but Asset Voting is not the method commonly called Dodgson's
Method, hence the confusion.
>
> 2010/4/21 Andrew Myers
>
> > On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> >
> > However, I strongly urge peopl
2010/4/21 Andrew Myers
> On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> However, I strongly urge people who attempt to analyze the situation
> and to propose reforms to:
>
> 1. Keep it simple. An extraordinarily powerful system for fully
> proportional representation consisting of a seemingl
On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
However, I strongly urge people who attempt to analyze the situation
and to propose reforms to:
1. Keep it simple. An extraordinarily powerful system for fully
proportional representation consisting of a seemingly-simple tweak on
Single Transferable
At 07:55 AM 4/20/2010, Raph Frank wrote:
Btw, you should look into the delegable proxy system. This is also
designed to allow effective communication without overloading the
voters.
Asset Voting was invented when Dodgson realized that most voters were
people busy with their lives. They were n
At 04:42 PM 4/19/2010, Duane Johnson wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am new to this forum, thanks to James Green-Armytage who sent me
the address. I am a software engineer in Chicago who also happens
to be interested in voting methods.
I'd like to propose a voting method that may be of interest
here
Good Morning, Duane Johnson
I plan to study your proposal but have not had time to do so. I expect
to have questions for you and will post them as soon as I've had time to
think about what you've written. That may not be for a week or so.
Fred Gohlke
Election-Methods mailing list - see
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Duane Johnson wrote:
> The voting process would go like this:
> 1. (By some process outside the scope of this proposal), it is determined
> that an issue needs to be voted on
This could be an issue, as controlling what people get to vote on
represents considerab
Hi Everyone,
I am new to this forum, thanks to James Green-Armytage who sent me the
address. I am a software engineer in Chicago who also happens to be
interested in voting methods.
I'd like to propose a voting method that may be of interest here. It
has also been cross-posted to the id
20 matches
Mail list logo
