> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 18:23:28 +0200 (CEST)
> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [EM] lower preferences
> Donald wants high-utility candidates (at least, high-utility for SOME
> group). I would recommend Approval, but Donald seems worried that voters
> will
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:20:02AM -0400, Donald Davison wrote:
> If a majority does not regard your candidate as a beauty, just remember,
> `Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.' Nader is not the beauty of the
> majority of the people, so you have no right to advocate election methods
> that wil
--- Donald Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
> If a majority does not regard your candidate as a beauty, just remember,
> `Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.' Nader is not the beauty of the
> majority of the people, so you have no right to advocate election methods
> that will fool this
