On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:33:19 +0100, Markus Schulze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Paul,
your Condorcet/RP variant sounds like Steve Eppley's
minimize thwarted majorities (MTM) method.
Thanks for the pointer! Having a bit of difficulty finding a
definition of MTM online, but there seems to be
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:39:57 +, Paul Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:33:19 +0100, Markus Schulze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Paul,
your Condorcet/RP variant sounds like Steve Eppley's
minimize thwarted majorities (MTM) method.
For each of the n! possible
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:33:03 +, Paul Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:33:19 +0100, Markus Schulze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your Condorcet/RP variant sounds like Steve Eppley's
minimize thwarted majorities (MTM) method.
MTM is exactly equivalent to my method.
Hi,
Markus S wrote about Paul Crowley's proposed voting method:
your Condorcet/RP variant sounds like Steve Eppley's
minimize thwarted majorities (MTM) method.
I think of the name MTM as an old name for MAM, which stands
for maximize affirmed majorities. To my ear, maximize
affirmed
Hi,
Paul C asked:
Does Eppley still read this list?
Yes, sometimes. By the way, I prefer that my friends
call me Steve.
I'd be interested to know why he now favours MAM over MTM.
I changed the name from MTM to MAM to sound more positive.
I chose the tiebreaker for complete
Dear Steve,
you wrote (5 Nov 2004):
If he thinks it matters, hopefully Markus will tell us
which MTM tiebreaker he has in mind.
Your minimize thwarted majorities (MTM) method has been
defined here (23 Feb 2000):
Hi Andrew,
On Nov 1, 2004, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Myers wrote:
I thought people might be interested to know about some
recent improvements to the Condorcet Internet Voting Service at
http://www5.cs.cornell.edu/~andru/civs.
* It now implements three different completion rules, including
MAM, Beatpath
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 11:09:24 -0800, Steve Eppley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Markus S wrote about Paul Crowley's proposed voting method:
your Condorcet/RP variant sounds like Steve Eppley's
minimize thwarted majorities (MTM) method.
I think of the name MTM as an old name for MAM, which
Jobst,
Thanks for taking the time to look at this idea.
--- Jobst Heitzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
But the vector
(0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0)
is linearly independent from
(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1), [...]
Interesting, this is precisely what I ended up doing to convince
myself that the magnitudes
