MIKE OSSIPOFF nkklrp-at-hotmail.com |EMlist| wrote:
I realize that people aren't interested in these postings in which Russ
posts his astonishingly ignorance and I try to help him understand what
he's talking about. There' s no reason why his education should take
Mike, I have a Master's Degree
I realize that people aren't interested in these postings in which Russ
posts his astonishingly ignorance and I try to help him understand what he's
talking about. There' s no reason why his education should take place on
this mailing list. Take it off-list? Of course, and, as I said, I recomme
Dear Russ,
you wrote (26 Jan 2005):
> Also, when you insisted that I post pseudocode for CSSD at the site, I
> learned a lot about your level of sophistication. I told you that the
> Python code that I had already written essentially serves as pseudocode.
> That's partly why Python is a very "popu
MIKE OSSIPOFF nkklrp-at-hotmail.com |EMlist| wrote:
Russ continued:
Approval, on the other hand, will not necessarily reach a stable
equilibrium with only two dominant parties.
I comment:
?With Approval, if there's a party that's always voter-median or CW,
there will be a stable equilibrium with _
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:04:39 + MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
I wasn't going to disagree with anything Russ posted, because I didn't
want to seem to be picking on him, or argumentative. But, after a few of
his postings, I finally decided that any posting that says misleading
things can fairly and pr
I wasn't going to disagree with anything Russ posted, because I didn't
want to seem to be picking on him, or argumentative. But, after a few of his
postings, I finally decided that any posting that says misleading things can
fairly and properly be commented on.
Russ said:
Like plurality, IRV
