Dear Jobst,
--- Jobst Heitzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Does the CDTT have any other significance than the connection with Minimal
> Defense? In other
> words, what would you think of a method satisfying minimal defense but not
> CDTT?
I would rather let Markus discuss such issues as trun
Dear Kevin!
Does the CDTT have any other significance than the connection with Minimal
Defense? In other words, what would you think of a method satisfying minimal
defense but not CDTT?
Yours, Jobst
Kevin Venzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 13.09.05 06:31:34:
>
> Rob,
>
> --- Rob Lanphie
Rob,
--- Rob Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> As Abd alluded to in at least one email, it's possible to have a revised
> version of Copeland that works differently. For example, it could be
> possible to not credit a candidate with a victory if they don't receive
> majority support (calle
