On Sunday November 23 2003 9:20 pm, Ken Johnson wrote:
This is a follow-up to EM Vol 1, #355, Message 1, Re: touch screen
voting machines
Dave Ketchum wrote:
...
I think of a voting machine as a unit that supports a single voter at
a time, doing NO communication outside the room that
Eron Lloyd wrote:
On Sunday November 23 2003 9:20 pm, Ken Johnson wrote:
The summing and publication of vote subtotals for specific geographic
regions (e.g. precincts or districts) is, in my view, a violation of
voter secrecy.
In Belgium, we are suppose to mix a minimum of 3 burreau before hand
Dave Ketchum wrote:
We are getting in pretty deep here. I will repeat what I have said a
few times:
Vendor (whoever has this responsibility) writes program (whatever
is standard and in common for all precincts using this program).
Maybe the whole issue with BlackBox Voting is that we
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:46:11 +0100 David GLAUDE wrote:
Dave Ketchum wrote:
We are getting in pretty deep here. I will repeat what I have said a
few times:
Vendor (whoever has this responsibility) writes program (whatever
is standard and in common for all precincts using this program).
David GLAUDE asked:
Once again as this list is dedicated to advanced voting/counting method.
I would like to know which one are possible to handle with manual
counting on large scale.
Manual sorting and counting works OK for STV-PR in public elections. All electronic
voting
introduced for the
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:37:00 - James Gilmour wrote:
David GLAUDE asked:
Once again as this list is dedicated to advanced voting/counting
method.
I would like to know which one are possible to handle with manual
counting on large scale.
Manual sorting and counting works OK for STV-PR in
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:59:28 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
It depends on whether you do Disk-At-Once or Track-At-Once recording.
If you do Disk-At-Once (i.e. write all the ballots in one go), then
what I said above
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:37:09 + Gervase Lam wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:59:28 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
It depends on whether you do Disk-At-Once or Track-At-Once recording.
If you do Disk-At-Once (i.e. write all
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:24:57 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David GLAUDE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EM] Electronic Voting Bill of Rights?
Recording ONLY at the end was my assumption.
Each record of votes is required to contain votes in random order
--- Ernest Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS (EVSs)
3. MUST allow me to verify that my vote was entered and counted
correctly
No. This is bad. If you can verify your vote (after leaving the polling place) you
can sell your vote.
If you
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 10:36:58 +0100 David GLAUDE wrote:
Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
On Nov 14, 2003, at 1:55 PM, David GLAUDE wrote:
I think that before any electronic system get introduced, you need to
carefull set the goal and define what democratic election are.
I actually think that this is
I did not reply to your DVD solution...
One reason that it was technologicaly confusing. ;-)
Here are some attempt to define the best option:
* The booting media must be read-only.
* This media should be unique to that voting place and activated by a
key. The key and the media should take
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:42:21 +0100 David GLAUDE wrote:
I did not reply to your DVD solution...
One reason that it was technologicaly confusing. ;-)
But thanks for coming in now. There is a limit to how big the original
draft should be (else no one reads it all).
Here are some attempt to define
Forest Simmons wrote:
Every four years the little guy is given a choice between Tweedle Dumb and
Tweedle Dumber. If somebody will pay him twenty dollars for voting, why
not let him get something out of the process?
[...]
All of you libertarians should support the right of anybody to sell his
vote
14 matches
Mail list logo
