Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:50:26 +0100
From: Jobst Heitzig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no sincere way to specify utilities.
Prove me wrong and tell me what a sincere utility could possibly be!
How about the probability that the candidate in question would represent
me accurately in his vote on a
From: Juho Laatu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
In an earlier mail I brought up the question what would be the best
Condorcet completion method in the case that we would have the luxury
of sincere votes. I would appreciate your comments on this.
Any opinions?
...
I would think that if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that if votes are sincere, the best voting method would not be Condorcet at all. It would be for each voter to assign a number of points to each candidate representing the utility they ascribe to that candidate. The candidate with the largest total utility
