Indeed, checkboxes always worked for me too.
On May 24, 2013 at 9:00 PM Craig wrote:
> Checkboxes always worked for me. I don't think the touchscreen revolution
> is responsible for the transition to switches (a checkbox is no less user
> friendly than a switch afaik).
--
Mailing list: https://
Checkboxes always worked for me. I don't think the touchscreen revolution
is responsible for the transition to switches (a checkbox is no less user
friendly than a switch afaik).
On May 24, 2013 1:31 PM, "Jakob Eriksson" wrote:
>
> Which I find incredibly confusing, at least on iOS.
> More than o
Which I find incredibly confusing, at least on iOS.
More than once I have misread it for its opposite.
(It doesn't help that it seems to be pretty hard to "get
a hold of" on iPhone, but that is another matter.
I am not very fond of Xylons idea or skeumorphic stuff
in general. To me the whole ide
The one implemented in elementary OS, iOS, GNOME, OS X, Android... The
on/off switcher is becoming a new standard since touch devices started
becoming a new frontier for UX design.
"It has become a standard in modern operating systems"
Ehem...this is me being stupid, but what is the standard swit
"It has become a standard in modern operating systems"
Ehem...this is me being stupid, but what is the standard switch in current
modern operating systems anyway?
On 24 May 2013 15:15, Alfredo Hernández wrote:
> The current one is clear enough and It has become a standard in modern
> operating
The current one is clear enough and It has become a standard in modern
operating systems. I don't see the need to change it.
Regards.
On 24 May 2013 13:09, "A. "Xylon" V." wrote:
> I have an idea for a new GtkSwitch image in the eGtk theme. See the
> attached file.
>
> This new GtkSwitch is skeu
6 matches
Mail list logo
