I agree on pretty much all the criticism. It's a nice aesthetic, but
functionality wise I think it has to many flaws. Nice effort, but a
no-go for me.
On 11/20/2012 09:53 PM, Daniel Foré wrote:
As I commented on the merge request I disapprove of this branch for
several reasons:
* The vertica
On a practical note, how is this going to scroll? Sure, in this mockup it all
perfectly fits, but what happens when "Hardware section gets more items? Does
the complete view scroll, or only the seperate sections?
What happens when we suddenly decide to add another section, which can
evidently n
As I commented on the merge request I disapprove of this branch for several
reasons:
* The vertical layout doesn't really make sense to me. Displays are
typically landscape, not portrait. Remember, Switchboard is not a static
thing, it's extendable meaning that we have no idea how many plugs it wi
https://code.launchpad.net/~tombeckmann/switchboard/restructure/+merge/127597
"* The vertical layout doesn't really make sense to me.
* Displays are typically landscape, not portrait. This layout is going
to cause unecessary amounts of scrolling and doesn't take advantage of the
width of the
Vertical layout is not as friendly to wrapping around plug-ins for those
categories with numerous entries. Layout is also less friendly to addition
of new categories or cleaner visualization when you have categories with a
significant different number of plug-ins. Current horizontal layout works
@Cody,
I saw that and I wondered why. It'd be good if we can get him to comment on
why he Disapproved it :)
On 20 November 2012 20:38, Cody Garver wrote:
> This was proposed for merge before and Disapproved by DanRabbit.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:36 PM, David Gomes wrote:
>
>> >obviously
I prefer reading left-to-right rather than top-to-bottom:
Category
ItemItemItem ...
_
Category
ItemItemItem ...
rather than
Category | Category
Item | Item
Item | Item
Item | Item
I find it easier to parse and less distracting.
Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:
This was proposed for merge before and Disapproved by DanRabbit.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:36 PM, David Gomes wrote:
> >obviously
> I prefer this very much and don't see why not for Luna as long as no bugs
> are associated with it.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Sam Tate wrote:
>
>> Ho
>obviously
I prefer this very much and don't see why not for Luna as long as no bugs
are associated with it.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Sam Tate wrote:
> How do we all feel about this new layout for Switchboard? Obviously this
> isn't for Luna, but I think it's really nice, and we can swi
It's great, but AFAIK any developer can program their very own plug to
integrate it with Switchboard. If this is true, I think that eventually
Switchboard may be a pain with external plugs --which is unlikely to happen
in the current layout. mode.
Anyway, I prefer this new layout, it's classier.
10 matches
Mail list logo
