?
Yes, that should be enough.
Regards,
Giridhar
--
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
is licensed
under GPLv2 only. This could make it more difficult to relicense
ELinks back to GPL v2 or later.
Is there an intention to license ELinks under GPLv2+?
Regards,
Giridhar
--
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
afterwhich, I will package snapshots of 0.13 for experimental. I will
update the version in unstable per official ELinks 0.12 releases, so
hopefully one of those will make it usable on GNU/Hurd.
Cheers,
Giridhar
--
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
to see enabled in
the 0.12 experimental packages and if you are OK with the additional bug
reports that might flow in as a result.
Cheers,
Giridhar
--
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 08/01/23 23:28 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash-ELinks interaction, because
Resending with a X-PTS-Approved header.
On 08/01/23 23:28 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash
On 08/01/19 10:00 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
elinks-0.11.3.tar.bz2. The debian/, po/*.gmo, po/.deps, config.log,
config.status and features.log have been removed. But 988 is a nice to
We should keep po/*.gmo in elinks-*.tar.gz
