You need the --assume_function_wrapper flag.
Also, if you have more troubles you could also drop the compilation level
to SIMPLE. The difference should be no larger than few kb in gzipped form.
It is worth mentioning that at such small sizes, even the unminified output
gzips to very tiny sizes.
I
Thank you and sorry for the second message. I thought I forgot to click
“Submit”.
Have a nice, nice day!
R+
> On 26 Jan 2017, at 04:46, Duane Johnson wrote:
>
> (Note from list admin: Rudolf, I didn't approve your second message because
> it seemed like a duplicate attempt. We've had problem
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 3:45:24 AM UTC, Robert Lee wrote:
>
> The following fits in good enough for me.
>
> filterDiv : List (Maybe (H.Attribute msg)) -> List (Maybe (H.Html msg)) ->
> H.Html msg
> filterDiv a n =
> H.div (List.filterMap identity a) (List.filterMap identity n)
>
Yes,
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 3:30:25 AM UTC-5, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> You need the --assume_function_wrapper flag.
>
Thank you Peter!!! That was all that was necessary, no need for the
compiler to emit anything special. I updated the build script and am
proceeding happily.
I am hearing wh
I was mostly talking about size. I know Closure very well, and I'm well
aware of what code must look like in order to get the most out of advanced
opts. The way Elm is compiled makes it easy for uglify to get the same
results in mangling and dead-code elimination, but of course it won't do
inli
Advanced opts won't work with Elm.
Check https://github.com/elm-lang/core/pull/734
Also, I'm surprised that uglify gives so bad results. As you can see in the
PR, my results didn't show that big a difference.
torsdag 26. januar 2017 12.53.31 UTC+1 skrev Ahmed Fasih følgende:
>
> On Thursday, Jan
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 7:43:13 AM UTC-5, Robin Heggelund Hansen
wrote:
>
> Advanced opts won't work with Elm. Check
> https://github.com/elm-lang/core/pull/734
> Also, I'm surprised that uglify gives so bad results. As you can see in
> the PR, my results didn't show that big a differen
Hmm, compare uglify with google closure is really misleading .. ( I am not
a fan of google or even remotely close, but as a compiler engineer , we
should respect basic facts)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:37 AM Robin Heggelund Hansen
wrote:
> I was mostly talking about size. I know Closure very well,
Hi Gordon,
I think it is inappropriate to discuss BuckleScript performances on this
mailing list (people may feel unhappy about this), if you are interested,
we can discuss on BuckleScript github issues(I will create a mailing list
too).
A minor comment:
> As Elm does not have mutable linear arr
We're using Elm in a smallish piece of a production application and are
evaluating whether we use it for the entire app.
One thing we find invaluable w/ JS frameworks like React or what have you,
is that we can package our source separate from the React library. Doesn't
matter too much on small
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Dave Rapin wrote:
> Just wondering if there's a good approach for this in Elm? Is there a way
> to split framework code & app code, or are we stuck with adding 100k to our
> payload every time we iterate?
>
> This is being worked on right now and something will be
Great news. Thanks for the quick response Peter. Amazing community!
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 10:25:14 AM UTC-5, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Dave Rapin
> > wrote:
>
>> Just wondering if there's a good approach for this in Elm? Is there a way
>> to split framewo
Hello community,
I thought that using elm on the backend would be hard but it turns out that
it is easy.
I took the websockets example and turned it into a stand alone webapp.
https://github.com/pdamoc/elm-sapling
The approach that I used is to describe an API between the client and the
server.
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 3:47:12 PM UTC, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> I took the websockets example and turned it into a stand alone webapp.
> https://github.com/pdamoc/elm-sapling
>
I see, as websockets are symetrical in the sense of being the same on
client and server side, they make this ea
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:40 PM, 'Rupert Smith' via Elm Discuss <
elm-discuss@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Still, its a long way from there to a full stack...
>
> Every journey has to start somewhere. Can you share a set of requirements
for a full-stack? Like, how would a checklist for your must hav
I've already done this. Full stack elm is not a feasable option right now.
You can use elm to drive your logic if you want but the amount of
boilerplate and overhead from the runtime make it inefficent for a server.
For full stack elm, with the server code in elm, youll find yoyrself
fighting nodem
Hi Noah,
I have read the readme but I don't understand what happen.
Can you give more details about what were the actual challenges
encountered?
Alternatively, can you provide a small challenge that would get someone
trying to implement it in the same troubles?
I'm thinking that maybe if more o
On Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:13:33 UTC+7, Bob Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi Gordon,
> I think it is inappropriate to discuss BuckleScript performances on this
> mailing list (people may feel unhappy about this), if you are interested,
> we can discuss on BuckleScript github issues(I will create a mail
As I said, you already get convinced elm is better for you, then happy
coding in elm. I am not interested in a biased judgement.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:29 PM GordonBGood wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 January 2017 21:13:33 UTC+7, Bob Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi Gordon,
> I think it is inappropriate to disc
Big picture:
I'm writing a visual display algorithm of a binary ".hex" file that is the
result of compiling code on the Arduino platform. I load the file into the
browser via HTTP.getString, and then attempt to display the values.
Problem:
I'm unable to find a way to represent this binary data s
My use case:
I have a compiled microcontroller file (a ".hex" file) delivered to the
client browser. I use the data to draw a fancy SVG barcode that is
subsequently displayed on the screen and scanned by a camera (like a QR
Code).
I need a way to retrieve binary data from the server, and iter
Totally agree. Reddit here I come.
Also, I feel we really need to treat Evan like the awesome leader he is. Give
the guy a break. He's making one of the best languages I've ever used.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubsc
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Duane Johnson
wrote:
> Char.toCode and Char.fromCode seem specifically tuned for use with
> keyboard events.
>
What does this mean? KeyCode is an alias to Int so, at least in theory, you
should have the actual Int value of the Char.
What happens if you display th
23 matches
Mail list logo
