Thanks for clearing things out!
W dniu niedziela, 4 grudnia 2016 02:40:41 UTC+1 użytkownik Michał Podwórny
napisał:
>
> Hi,
>
> Consider this:
> let
> x = 1
> in
> case something of
> x -> (...)
> _ -> (...)
>
> The compiler will complai
Hi,
Consider this:
let
x = 1
in
case something of
x -> (...)
_ -> (...)
The compiler will complain that "The following pattern is redundant",
pointing to the wildcard. I assume that Elm ignores the fact that "x" is
already bound, re-binds it in the first case match and that indeed m
