Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Nux!
On 11.10.2012 00:17, Phil Perry wrote: On 10/10/12 23:30, Trevor Hemsley wrote: I'd suggest kernel30 rather than kernel-lt since the long term in this case is not that long and soon we'll be trying to work out how to change kernel-lt-3.0-x to kernel-lt-3.8.x or whatever the next LTS kernel h

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Phil Perry
On 10/10/12 23:30, Trevor Hemsley wrote: I'd suggest kernel30 rather than kernel-lt since the long term in this case is not that long and soon we'll be trying to work out how to change kernel-lt-3.0-x to kernel-lt-3.8.x or whatever the next LTS kernel happens to be. Unless the desired action

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Phil Perry
On 10/10/12 23:23, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/11/2012 12:57 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: So let's try to move this on. As it is currently "my move", I shall confirm that I am prepared to "smile" at the suggestion of kernel-lt and kernel-ml. To begin with, I would need to perform a small operation

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Trevor Hemsley
On 10/10/12 23:23, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 10/11/2012 12:57 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: >> So let's try to move this on. As it is currently "my move", I shall >> confirm that I am prepared to "smile" at the suggestion of kernel-lt >> and kernel-ml. To begin with, I would need to perform a small >

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/11/2012 12:57 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: So let's try to move this on. As it is currently "my move", I shall confirm that I am prepared to "smile" at the suggestion of kernel-lt and kernel-ml. To begin with, I would need to perform a small operation upon a copy of the kernel-ml specification

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 10 October 2012 22:24, Phil Perry wrote: > On 10/10/12 19:29, Alan Bartlett wrote: >> >> I'm going to advertise my ignorance -- for what does the 'LTS' >> abbreviation stand, please? > > LTS = Long Term Service (although this is more of an Ubuntuism than a tern > used by kernel.org who prefer s

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Phil Perry
45 stable: 2.6.34.13 stable: 2.6.32.60 linux-next: next-20121010 [/quote] What I am currently supporting for EL6 -- In brief, the 3.0 series and the (latest) 3.6 series. Any evidence you have for the 3.5 series is purely an artefact that currently exists for the newly est

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Alan Bartlett
3.6.1 mainline: 3.6 stable: 3.5.6 stable: 3.4.13 stable: 3.3.8 (EOL) stable: 3.2.31 stable: 3.0.45 stable: 2.6.34.13 stable: 2.6.32.60 linux-next: next-20121010 [/quote] What I am currently supporting for EL6 -- In brief, the 3.0 se

[elrepo] Announcement: EL6 Updated mesa Release [Version 8.0.4-2]

2012-10-10 Thread Akemi Yagi
Announcing the release of updated mesa packages into the EL6 elrepo repository: http://elrepo.org/tiki/mesa These package provide the mesa version 3D drivers, runtime libraries, and development files to work with xorg-x11-drv-intel packages for EL6. These packages have been rebuilt with the --en

[elrepo] Announcement: EL5 New kmod-wch Release [Version 1.0.0.0-0]

2012-10-10 Thread Akemi Yagi
Announcing the release of new wch packages into the EL5 elrepo repository: http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-wch This package provides the wch kernel module for MCS9865 I/O PCI cards, version 1.0.0.0-0, and is kABI compatible with all kernels from 5.0 (kernel-2.6.18-8.el5) upwards. It is built to depe

[elrepo] Announcement: EL5 New kmod-golden_tulip Release [Version 17-0]

2012-10-10 Thread Akemi Yagi
Announcing the release of new kmod-golden_tulip packages into the EL5 elrepo repository: http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-golden_tulip This package provides the golden_tulip kernel module for SystemBase I/O PCI cards, version 17-0, and is kABI compatible with all kernels from 5.0 (kernel-2.6.18-8.el5)

Re: [elrepo] How long does kernel release stay in the downloads area?

2012-10-10 Thread Steve Clark
On 10/09/2012 08:17 PM, Phil Perry wrote: On 04/10/12 18:49, Antonio Dupont wrote: Hello On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 10/03/2012 05:57 PM, Antonio Dupont wrote: Hello Akemi, Thank you for the reply. The ke

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Nux!
On 10.10.2012 11:28, Phil Perry wrote: How about kernel-ml and kernel-lts for mainline and lts kernels, respectively. But even that gets complicated as it looks like Alan is currently maintaining 3.0, 3.5 and 3.6 branches. Still, renaming the 3.0.x packages to kernel-lts would at least differen

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Phil Perry
On 10/10/12 11:18, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Phil Perry wrote: On 10/10/12 09:30, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:21 AM, Nux! wrote: On 10.10.2012 09:12, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/10/2012 01:18 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Phil Perry wrote: On 10/10/12 09:30, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: Oh well. +1 for separating LTS. "kernel-ml" is too broad now, covering 3-4 different versions. Great suggestion. I agree, it makes sense to separate versions so yum is able to in

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Nux!
On 10.10.2012 11:18, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: perhaps you could rename the packages kernel-ml-lts and keep them in the same repo, not sure if it's better than a separate repo but I don't see other options. Yes, I was going to suggest this as well. So it's either this or a different repo.

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Phil Perry wrote: On 10/10/12 09:30, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:21 AM, Nux! wrote: On 10.10.2012 09:12, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their own repo or would it be just spreading too thin?

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Phil Perry
On 10/10/12 09:30, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:21 AM, Nux! wrote: On 10.10.2012 09:12, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their own repo or would it be just spreading too thin? Maybe some hardlin

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/10/2012 11:21 AM, Nux! wrote: On 10.10.2012 09:12, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their own repo or would it be just spreading too thin? Maybe some hardlinks as to not waste space.. I'm not using t

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Nux!
On 10.10.2012 09:12, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their own repo or would it be just spreading too thin? Maybe some hardlinks as to not waste space.. I'm not using the lts kernel but I'm thinking many

Re: [elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/10/2012 11:09 AM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their own repo or would it be just spreading too thin? Maybe some hardlinks as to not waste space.. I'm not using the lts kernel but I'm thinking many do and they don't want to have the lts kernel

[elrepo] kernel/kernel-lts separation

2012-10-10 Thread Nux!
Hi, Guys, is there a possibility to have the TLS kernels in their own repo or would it be just spreading too thin? Maybe some hardlinks as to not waste space.. I'm not using the lts kernel but I'm thinking many do and they don't want to have the lts kernel updated by the "latest" one. I know p