Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Similar defining macros use unquoted symbols too. To be backward
>compatible, quoting the symbol is still allowed.
>
> Then the original text is OK. I just thought that it _had_ to be
> [un]quoted, as in most macros.
>
> For s
Similar defining macros use unquoted symbols too. To be backward
compatible, quoting the symbol is still allowed.
Then the original text is OK. I just thought that it _had_ to be
[un]quoted, as in most macros.
For simplicity and consistency, we should document it as using
>From my previous reply:
I just thought that it _had_ to be quoted, as in most macros.
I of course meant unquoted.
Sincerely,
Luc.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
Lute Kamstra wrote:
Similar defining macros use unquoted symbols too. To be backward
compatible, quoting the symbol is still allowed.
Then the original text is OK. I just thought that it _had_ to be
quoted, as in most macros.
Sincerely,
Luc.
___
Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lute Kamstra wrote:
>
> This macro creates a new generic mode. The argument @var{mode} is
> the name of the command for the generic mode; it need not be quoted.
>
> "Name" sounds like a string. "need not" sounds like it is up to the
> user whether
Lute Kamstra wrote:
This macro creates a new generic mode. The argument @var{mode} is
the name of the command for the generic mode; it need not be quoted.
"Name" sounds like a string. "need not" sounds like it is up to the
user whether he quotes it or not. Is this really correct or is it
t
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shall I document define-generic-mode in lispref/modes.texi? I think
> its own node "Generic Modes", right after the node "Derived Modes",
> would be appropriate.
>
> You can try drafting something, and I will tell you what I think of
> it
Shall I document define-generic-mode in lispref/modes.texi? I think
its own node "Generic Modes", right after the node "Derived Modes",
would be appropriate.
You can try drafting something, and I will tell you what I think of
it.
___
Emacs
Shall I document define-generic-mode in lispref/modes.texi? I think
its own node "Generic Modes", right after the node "Derived Modes",
would be appropriate.
Lute.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
