Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-26 Thread Nick Dokos
Ken Mankoff writes: > People here might be interested in a publication from [2014-12-19 Fri] > available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115069 > > Title: An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used > in Academic Research and Development > > Summary: Word users are mo

Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-26 Thread Christopher W. Ryan
This seems like more of a typing contest than anything else. Reproducing a single page of an already-typeset document is not what LaTeX is designed for, nor is it what scientists do for a living. The test selections were absurdly short relative to the typical scientic manuscript. Long and complex d

Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-26 Thread briangpowell .
Word is a desktop publishing system. LaTeX is a macro language which lays on top of TeX=Tau-Epsilon-Chi~Art in Greek TeX is computerized typesetting that enables vector graphics--you can get TeX to draw anything you want--you can even create your own font. More Math journals and books you'd find

[O] How to get your list of categories?

2014-12-26 Thread rene
I'd like to dynamically get the list of all of my categories (:CATEGORY: property). Is there an easy way to do that? How can I write a command that would operate much the same way I get - the list of all my TODO keywords (using C-c a T), or - the list of all my TAGS (using C-c a M)? -- Rene

Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-26 Thread Thomas S. Dye
,-- | "One may also argue that given a well-designed LaTeX document class | file, document development speed and text and formatting accuracy are | significantly improved." `-

[O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-26 Thread Ken Mankoff
People here might be interested in a publication from [2014-12-19 Fri] available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115069 Title: An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used in Academic Research and Development Summary: Word users are more efficient and have less errors

[O] Bug: Invalid hline refernce + org-edit-special freeze emacs [8.2.10 (8.2.10-29-g89a0ac-elpa @ /home/artis/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20141222/)]

2014-12-26 Thread Artis Rozentāls
A reference to a non-existant hline as the formula target results in a complete freeze when running org-edit-special (and moving the cursor down if invoked via C-c ') despite performing seemingly correct calculations. An example of such a table is attached. System info: Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.3.1

[O] Bug: evaluation of a js block that ouputs a large array does not format the output as a table [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/Chocolatey/lib/Emacs.24.4.0.20141122/tools/share/emacs/24.4/lisp/org/)]

2014-12-26 Thread Victor Valdivia
Hello. When I execute this snippet: #+BEGIN_SRC js return [[1, 2, 3, 4],[1, 2, 3, 4],[1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4],[1, 2, 3, 4]]; #+END_SRC I get this result instead of a table. #+RESULTS: : [[1 (\, 2) (\, 3) (\, 4)] (\, [1 (\, 2) (\, 3) (\, 4)]) (\, [1 (\, 2) (\, 3) (\, 4)]) (\, [1 (\, 2) (\, 3) (

[O] [bug, master] Returned table column names broken after #+call function from lob-table-operations.org

2014-12-26 Thread Miguel Ruiz
The following minimal example (emacs -Q) yields (key, t1c2, t2c2) as column names after #+call: table-operations-combine-merge[1] with org-master (release_8.3beta-686-g9528be); org-maint (release_8.2.10-29-g89a0ac) works as expected yielding (Col1, Col2, Col3). [1] http://orgmode.org/w/?p=worg

Re: [O] noweb syntax and R

2014-12-26 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello Vikas, Vikas Rawal wrote: > The examples given on the page below do not work for me. > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html#meta-programming-language > > It seems there has been some change in the way results from one source block > are > called into another (R) source cod

[O] noweb syntax and R

2014-12-26 Thread Vikas Rawal
The examples given on the page below do not work for me. http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html#meta-programming-language It seems there has been some change in the way results from one source block are called into another (R) source code block. Vikas