[O] Agenda with an archived indicator

2014-12-28 Thread Yuri Niyazov
I am trying to build an agenda view that includes both Archived and non-Archived items, and includes an indicator whether an item is archived or not. Here's how I've gotten it to work so far: In custom agenda: (... (org-agenda-prefix-format "%(yn/org-archived-display) %-11c%-11T%-11s") ... ) (de

Re: [O] Bug: evaluation of a js block that ouputs a large array does not format the output as a table [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/Chocolatey/lib/Emacs.24.4.0.20141122/tools/share/emacs/24.4/lisp/org/

2014-12-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Victor Valdivia writes: > When I execute this snippet: > #+BEGIN_SRC js > return [[1, 2, 3, 4],[1, 2, 3, 4],[1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4],[1, 2, 3, 4]]; > #+END_SRC > > I get this result instead of a table. > #+RESULTS: > : [[1 (\, 2) (\, 3) (\, 4)] (\, [1 (\, 2) (\, 3) (\, 4)]) (\, [1 (\,

[O] Typo in manual

2014-12-28 Thread Daniel E . Doherty
Carsten et al., I just noticed in footnote 2 of section 2.2 of the org manual, the following typo: , | (2) Clocking only works with headings indented less then 30 stars. ` The 'less then' should be 'less than'. Regards, -- Daniel E

Re: [O] changing cells in an org-mode table with Emacs lisp

2014-12-28 Thread Michael Brand
Hi Tamas On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Tamas Papp wrote: > | a | a | > | aa | aa | > | aaa | aaa | > > would be replaced by > > | *a* | *a* | > | aa | *aa* | > | aaa | aaa | #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results silent (defun format-cell (cell row col) (if (<= (length cell) col)

Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-28 Thread Pascal Fleury
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Fabrice Popineau < fabrice.popin...@supelec.fr> wrote: > I agree that this study is certainly not large enough to draw strong > conclusions, but it raises a couple of questions > and some points may require attention. > > I have spent many years in the TeX world.

Re: [O] Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word

2014-12-28 Thread Bob Newell
The "study" is an obvious diatribe couched in (poorly done) scientific method. It almost seems like these researchers have at some time been required to use LaTeX and are angry over it. I will agree that LaTeX is slower and less efficient than LibreOffice (I don't have Word on any of my computers

[O] Drawers and visibility cycling

2014-12-28 Thread Steven Arntson
I've never been able to get drawers to go through a visibility cycle, and so have always avoided using them, but now I have a use-case in which they would be very handy. Here's my "not working" process: + type some sample text. + select the region and do `C-c C-x d' + I'm queried for the title of

Re: [O] Drawers and visibility cycling

2014-12-28 Thread Bob Newell
Steven Arntson writes: > Here's my "not working" process: > > + type some sample text. > + select the region and do `C-c C-x d' > + I'm queried for the title of the drawer and type "test" > > The result looks like this: > > :testdrawer: > test content > :END: I've always had to put the drawer ti

Re: [O] Drawers and visibility cycling

2014-12-28 Thread Steven Arntson
Bob Newell writes: > Steven Arntson writes: > >> Here's my "not working" process: >> >> + type some sample text. >> + select the region and do `C-c C-x d' >> + I'm queried for the title of the drawer and type "test" >> >> The result looks like this: >> >> :testdrawer: >> test content >> :END: >

[O] Org-mode to feed a database

2014-12-28 Thread Vikas Rawal
This is, in all likelihood, a crazy idea. Please excuse me for that. I often need to get a number of people enter complex survey data into a database using some kind of forms. The forms I need are fairly complex (with several nested grids, for example). I need radio-buttons and drop-down menus-

Re: [O] Drawers and visibility cycling

2014-12-28 Thread Steven Arntson
Steven Arntson writes: > Bob Newell writes: > >> Steven Arntson writes: >> >>> Here's my "not working" process: >>> >>> + type some sample text. >>> + select the region and do `C-c C-x d' >>> + I'm queried for the title of the drawer and type "test" >>> >>> The result looks like this: >>> >>> :