Hello,
I recently started looking at the org-set-tags function in org.el, but then
quickly got confused with the doc-string.
"Set the tags for the current headline.
With prefix ARG, realign all tags in headings in the current buffer.
When JUST-ALIGN is non-nil, only align tags."
The purpose of
Composite agenda views can now set org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks locally.
0002-org-agenda.el-Support-for-dimming-local-to-each-agen.patch
Description: Binary data
The "previous-sibling" blocker sometimes checked the previous /visible/
heading,
instead of the true previous sibling.
0001-org-depend.el-Fix-check-for-previous-sibling-blocker.patch
Description: Binary data
> Hello,
> Kaushal Modi writes:
> This is not possible, and is exactly what annoys me in the current
> implementation.
> Moreover, I'm pretty sure you don't review every table in your
> document at the second it is opened. So there is no need to store
> the columns
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kaushal Modi writes:
>
> > 1. Need to save the column narrowed state somehow individually for each
> > column, specific to a table in a document.
>
> This is not possible, and is exactly what annoys me in the current
> implement
Hello,
Kaushal Modi writes:
> 1. Need to save the column narrowed state somehow individually for each
> column, specific to a table in a document.
This is not possible, and is exactly what annoys me in the current
implementation.
Moreover, I'm pretty sure you don't review every table in your d
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:26 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
>
> I don't use column narrowing; I don't know what other users expect from
> it either.
>
I use column narrowing when I need to fit all columns of an org table in a
screen width (roughly 100 chars wide).
If I have a column called "Descript
Hi Nicolas
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Michael Brand writes:
>> Also I hope that you can build in complete removal of columns for
>> export similar to as discussed around here:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2016-04/msg00672.html
> Besides, wa
Hi Kaushal
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Kaushal Modi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017, 2:19 AM Michael Brand
> wrote:
>> Also I hope that you can build in complete removal of columns for
>> export similar to as discussed around here:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2016-04/
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Rasmus wrote:
>
> Bastien Guerry writes:
> > Kyle Meyer writes:
> >>> It will be in the next release (in /emacs/etc/org/). If there's a license
> >>> issue it needs to be removed.
> >
> > The reason why this library-of-babel.org was not in Emacs is not
> > becau
Thanks Kyle,
After some fiddling, here is the solution I found that works fine with
orgmode 9.x (from https://github.com/DarwinAwardWinner/ido-ubiquitous):
(require 'ido-completing-read+)
(ido-ubiquitous-mode 1)
Now completion works smoothly (using ido-vertical) for refile (and
everywhere else to
Yes, thank you.
Right now, I have a few org files in a folder that are all registered as
org-agenda-files. When I go to my agenda, tasks from these files show up.
Many of these tasks have tags. In an old version of org mode, when I
clicked on these tags, I was met with an agenda view of all tasks
Uwe Brauer writes:
> That would be great indeed. So please don't drop the branch but instead,
> if you have time, try that and I would be more than happy to test it and
> then hopefully narrowing based on cookies could be dropped.
I will as soon as I have an idea about the "that" I have to try.
>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> So you are saying we cannot have both.
> I'm not. I'm opposed to have overlapping features with two different
> implementations, that's all.
>> But couldn't the feature of shrink one particular wide column to a
Hello,
William Horne writes:
> Org mode is not registering tags as links to a modified agenda. When I revert
> to an old version of org mode (8.2.10), the tags link me to a modified agenda.
I'm not sure to understand your bug report. Could you clarify it a bit?
Would you have an example demons
Hello,
Michael Brand writes:
> Also I hope that you can build in complete removal of columns for
> export similar to as discussed around here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2016-04/msg00672.html
This is orthogonal to the issue at hand.
Besides, was I supposed to implement i
Uwe Brauer writes:
> So you are saying we cannot have both.
I'm not. I'm opposed to have overlapping features with two different
implementations, that's all.
> But couldn't the feature of shrink one particular wide column to a
> certain width be implemented using your new implementation?
I al
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017, 2:19 AM Michael Brand
wrote:
>
> Also I hope that you can build in complete removal of columns for
> export similar to as discussed around here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2016-04/msg00672.html
I am also interested in this feature.
- I liked
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Kyle Meyer writes:
>
Apparently, library-of-babel.org is not distributed with the Org mode
that ships with emacs. Not sure why that is. I'm guessing it's a
license issue?
>>>
>>> It will be in the next release (in /emacs/etc/org/). If there's a license
>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> If you want to implement the second feature differently, because of
>> maintain reasons that sound reasonable, but please don't simple remove
>> the second feature.
> Then I'll just drop this branch. I'
>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> If you want to implement the second feature differently, because of
>> maintain reasons that sound reasonable, but please don't simple remove
>> the second feature.
> Then I'll just drop this bran
Hello,
Christian Garbs writes:
> I'll send the mail to ass...@gnu.org and while waiting for the
> process, I'll write some documentation based on ob-doc-template.org
Great! Thank you.
In the meantime, would you want to sent your library as a patch so that
we can review it?
Regards,
--
Nicol
Hello,
Alex Branham writes:
> From: Alex Branham
> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:08:58 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: change order of items, support custom time grid
> string
>
> * lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agenda-time-grid): Users may now customize
> the string to display after the time in th
Hello,
Uwe Brauer writes:
> If you want to implement the second feature differently, because of
> maintain reasons that sound reasonable, but please don't simple remove
> the second feature.
Then I'll just drop this branch. I'm against having the same (sub-set of
a) feature implemented in two d
24 matches
Mail list logo
