Re: [O] Bug: Problems with ob-scheme in geiser-eval--retort-output [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpa @ /home/lockywolf/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20191021/)]

2019-10-21 Thread Vladimir Nikishkin
On 21/10/2019 23:24, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > Well, checking for "output" doesn't seem to be useful any way, since > "output" is never 'nil. > > Regarding the fact that the error should be reported to the geiser > mailing list, that's entirely true. The problem is that the person who > would

Re: [O] Bug Report: Broken Link in Worg

2019-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Joshua Meyers writes: > In this page (https://orgmode.org/worg/org-gtd-etc.html) the link to > the "very instructive post by Pete Phillips" now directs to the > defunct gmane.org.  I think I tracked down the post it is supposed > to link to, so I don't want others to have to do this work again:

Re: [O] Bug: Problems with ob-scheme in geiser-eval--retort-output [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpa @ /home/lockywolf/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20191021/)]

2019-10-21 Thread Neil Jerram
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 15:16, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > Yeah. The "output" is not the result of geiser's elisp functions, as far > as I understand, it comes from comint, which reads it from a scheme > interpreter, and is expected to be formatted specifically to be fed into >

Re: [O] Bug: Problems with ob-scheme in geiser-eval--retort-output [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpa @ /home/lockywolf/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20191021/)]

2019-10-21 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Vladimir, On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 03:21, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > > Can we replace the (set) on line 177 of ob-scheme.el with the following > form: > (setq result (if output > (let ((g-r-o (geiser-eval--retort-output ret))) > (if g-r-o >

Re: [O] org-fast-todo-selection window behaviour?

2019-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Matt, I made this change, because I found the previous way jarring. The window with the selection information showed up in different places depending on what the current window setup is. With the new implementation, the info window is always in the same predictable place. After the selection

Re: [O] org-table-iterate function not working on multiline #+TBLFM

2019-10-21 Thread Loris Bennett
...@gmail.com writes: > org-table-iterate function not working on multiline #+TBLFM > > > > | 1 | 2 | > | | | > | | | > > #+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$2=@1 > #+TBLFM: @3$1..@3$2=@2 > > I have to stroke C-c C-c on each line of #+TBLFM You have to write | 1 | 2 | | | | | | |

[O] org-table-iterate function not working on multiline #+TBLFM

2019-10-21 Thread 11111111111
org-table-iterate function not working on multiline #+TBLFM | 1 | 2 | | | | | | | #+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$2=@1 #+TBLFM: @3$1..@3$2=@2 I have to stroke C-c C-c on each line of #+TBLFM

[O] Bug: python src var error [9.1.9 (release_9.1.9-65-g5e4542 @ /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/org/)]

2019-10-21 Thread Claire Chambers
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.

[O] Bug Report: Broken Link in Worg

2019-10-21 Thread Joshua Meyers
In this page (https://orgmode.org/worg/org-gtd-etc.html) the link to the "very instructive post by Pete Phillips" now directs to the defunct gmane.org. I think I tracked down the post it is supposed to link to, so I don't want others to have to do this work again: