more below.
On 12/26/20, Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> On 26/12/2020, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
>> [... i can imagine great things possible with such extensions. for
>> example, you could have sets of tabs, selected by right click in
>> firefox, to save to a bunch of org entries. then you could load that
>
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 7:30 AM Jeremie Juste wrote:
>
> Hello John,
>
> As promised, I'm coming back about the formatting of NA_characters_.
> In org-mode 9.5 NA_characters_ are not printed anymore with :results
> value. See example 2 and 3 for more details. Please let me know if
> this post sol
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 9:20 AM Samuel Banya wrote:
>
> In that case, would a running csv where you paste in each month's new
> pull work? You could even keep the totals to the side, so that as you
> paste new data in e.g. cols A-D, your totals (in E and beyond) can sit
> right there happily? I a
On Sunday, 16 Jan 2022 at 10:35, Samuel Banya wrote:
> How would you able to keep the running totals in Column E?
Using your initial example, adding a header line to give a starting
point, the following works:
| Date | Item| |Debit | |
|+--
Colin Baxter 😺 writes:
> \(g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0}(\delta F/\delta m)\)
>
> Backslash city! I know which one I'd prefer to read.
Further, in-text single-letter variables that permeate mathematical
writing, and I think everyone would agree that $k$ reads well. Alas, as
soon as one needs to write
Hi Samuel,
> I got the Sourcehut invitation, but wanted to know, what else do I do from
> this point?
I assumed you meant you’d heard from Bastien and he’d invited you to the worg
repo. If that isn’t the case, then that would be the stumbling block.
Unfortunately, I haven’t seen much of Bastien
Hey Timothy,
I logged into my "Sourcehut" account but don't see the 'Worg' repo present.
I checked my email but don't see the invite for the 'Worg' repo.
Can you lead me in the right direction? I ask because I haven't used this
platform before.
Thanks,
Sam
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022, at 11:08 AM,
Hey there,
I deployed a new personal art portfolio website:
* https://www.sambanya.com
I am planning to use Emacs to create Org Mode files for the few main sections
of my site that aren't the Art Gallery page itself.
I'm trying to figure out how to get a modern Wordpress looking Org generated
Hi,
I've polished some raw ideas that I shared here a few days ago, and I
have written this little package:
https://gitlab.com/maciaschain/org-font-spec-preview
org-font-spec-preview allows you to preview arbitrary text strings in a
chosen font (or generate a complete specimen) as well as test o
Hi Samuel,
If you’ve been invited to the worg repo, you can just push to in 🙂. It’s
basically intended as a community wiki. There isn’t an explicit approval process
like there is with contributions to the org-mode codebase.
All the best,
Timothy
Hey there,
I got the Sourcehut invitation, but wanted to know, what else do I do from this
point?
Am I still waiting on Bastien to approve my contributions going forward?
Just wanted to make sure I'm doing everyone on my end :)
Thanks,
Sam
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022, at 1:47 PM, Samuel Banya wrote:
Actually, to end this thread, I actually used Eric Fraga's idea to just use
separate sections for each month, since this solves this problem indefinitely,
so thanks for the ideas in this thread as my workflow is definitely improved
for my finance spreadsheet.
Cool stuff, will include his quote
> In that case, would a running csv where you paste in each month's new
> pull work? You could even keep the totals to the side, so that as you
> paste new data in e.g. cols A-D, your totals (in E and beyond) can sit
> right there happily? I alluded to this with respect to the request to
> automat
Colin,
> > Colin Baxter writes:
> >> Ah, LaTeX3 - whatever happened to that?
...
> Yes, I know. My remark was tongue in cheek.
which leaves open whether your tongue was already in your cheek at:
> Indeed. Compare something like
>
> $g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0}(\delta F/\delta m)$
>
> with
>
Hello,
I appreciate the enthusiasm for Ledger, but I really just don't like the double
posting idea period.
I just need totals spreadsheet style, that's about it. I think the whole idea
behind bean count is tedious.
I just don't think like a mathematician in this respect, too brainy for me.
I
> Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>> Ah, LaTeX3 - whatever happened to that?
> If you're a LaTeX user, you're already using LaTeX3 to a very high
> extent, even if you don't see it. The current idea is not to
> replace LaTeX2e with LaTeX3 as a new versio
> On Jan 16, 2022, at 7:13 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 16 Jan 2022 at 00:36, Timothy wrote:
>>Hmm. Not sure about this. Keystroke wise we’re comparing $$
>>to \(. The latter can be completed by smartparens, but since
>>single dollars are reasonable Org conte
Hello John,
As promised, I'm coming back about the formatting of NA_characters_.
In org-mode 9.5 NA_characters_ are not printed anymore with :results
value. See example 2 and 3 for more details. Please let me know if
this post solves your issues. Woudl updating to 9.5 be an option for
you?
Best
Colin Baxter writes:
> Ah, LaTeX3 - whatever happened to that?
If you're a LaTeX user, you're already using LaTeX3 to a very high
extent, even if you don't see it. The current idea is not to replace
LaTeX2e with LaTeX3 as a new version, but to gradually incorporate
elements of LaTeX3 into the LaT
On Friday, 14 Jan 2022 at 19:26, autofrettage wrote:
> The question triggers an old LaTeX reflex; If the layout tweak or
> typography tune turns out to be very difficult to accomplish with
> LaTeX (including all the mainstream add-ons), then the reason could be
> that you ask for something which mo
On Sunday, 16 Jan 2022 at 00:36, Timothy wrote:
> Hmm. Not sure about this. Keystroke wise we’re comparing $$
> to \(. The latter can be completed by smartparens, but since
> single dollars are reasonable Org content the former can’t.
> At this point the only argumen
Colin Baxter 😺 writes:
>> Sébastien Miquel writes:
>
> > Hi, With respect to readability, I only mean to point out that the
> > $…$ syntax is one less character, and that the \(\) characters are
> > quite overloaded.
>
> Indeed. Compare something like
>
> $g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0
> Sébastien Miquel writes:
> Hi, With respect to readability, I only mean to point out that the
> $…$ syntax is one less character, and that the \(\) characters are
> quite overloaded.
Indeed. Compare something like
$g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0}(\delta F/\delta m)$
with
\(g=\lim_{\d
Hi
to add my two cents. I am latex user of _many_ years (as user of emacs +
org), and I use it often for math-loaded texts.
I do use $ (I actually did not even know that \( \) is (supposed to be)
the new way until I saw it generated by org.
As for $$ (or \[), I basically don't use it. I use
Hi,
With respect to readability, I only mean to point out that the $…$
syntax is one less character, and that the \(\) characters are quite
overloaded.
this is a good opportunity to point out that $/$$ are very much second
class citizens in LaTeX now, no matter what you may see in old documents
25 matches
Mail list logo
