Would you consider this as a bug?
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Eduardo Suarez wrote:
> Say next org file, where I want the content of entry ABA not to be shown (e.g.
> because it is not important).
>
> --- BEGIN ORG FILE ---
> #+STARTUP: content
> * A
> ** AA
> ** AB
> *** ABA
> :PRO
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:18 AM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> John Kitchin writes:
>
> > I am also not a fan of using Unicode here and prefer a simple ascii
> > asterisk. That works fine for me so far, but I am not a heavy user of
> bold
> > markup and citations.
>
> What about something like [cite/ci
John Kitchin writes:
> I am also not a fan of using Unicode here and prefer a simple ascii
> asterisk. That works fine for me so far, but I am not a heavy user of bold
> markup and citations.
What about something like [cite/citet*/:@key]?
"*/" is not recognised as bold ending.
> As I mentioned
I am also not a fan of using Unicode here and prefer a simple ascii
asterisk. That works fine for me so far, but I am not a heavy user of bold
markup and citations.
As I mentioned there is the same problem for links, and in the last 10
years I can’t recall an issue being reported with bold.
On Su
On 16/04/2022 10:07, Kaushal Modi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 7:38 AM Max Nikulin wrote:
For export to html produces the following link:
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/emacs.html#Browse_002dURL
I think, a better variant is
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html
Christophe Schockaert writes:
> ...
> So, "gM" is related to the second case (2), and I end up with the
> following error : "Capture abort: Buffer is read-only: # As you see, I am using Doom Emacs, but I think it’s related with what I
> am trying to do anyway.
> ...
> To me, this goes to the in
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
>> A less awkward solution (IMO) would be to use an entity like ⋆. It is
>> straightforward to add that to the org-element-citation-prefix-re. Then I
>> see something like this.
>
> So Ihor, is there any problem with John's proposed change here?
I am not a big fan of usi
Sharon Kimble writes:
> In the past this worked
>
> %%(diary-countdown 4 18 2022 7) Easter Monday Bank Holiday
>
> But now it doesn't.
>
> Can somebody help me get it working again please?
Could you please elaborate what exactly is not working for you.
What did you do? What did
